Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKellens, Karel
dc.contributor.authorBaumers, Martin
dc.contributor.authorFlanagan, William
dc.contributor.authorLifset, Reid
dc.contributor.authorDuflou, Joost R.
dc.contributor.authorGutowski, Timothy G
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-07T14:29:10Z
dc.date.available2018-12-07T14:29:10Z
dc.date.issued2017-08
dc.identifier.issn10881980
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/119453
dc.description.abstract© 2017 The Authors. Journal of Industrial Ecology, published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc., on behalf of Yale University. Additive manufacturing (AM) proposes a novel paradigm for engineering design and manufacturing, which has profound economic, environmental, and security implications. The design freedom offered by this category of manufacturing processes and its ability to locally print almost each designable object will have important repercussions across society. While AM applications are progressing from rapid prototyping to the production of end-use products, the environmental dimensions and related impacts of these evolving manufacturing processes have yet to be extensively examined. Only limited quantitative data are available on how AM manufactured products compare to conventionally manufactured ones in terms of energy and material consumption, transportation costs, pollution and waste, health and safety issues, as well as other environmental impacts over their full lifetime. Reported research indicates that the specific energy of current AM systems is 1 to 2 orders of magnitude higher compared to that of conventional manufacturing processes. However, only part of the AM process taxonomy is yet documented in terms of its environmental performance, and most life cycle inventory (LCI) efforts mainly focus on energy consumption. From an environmental perspective, AM manufactured parts can be beneficial for very small batches, or in cases where AM-based redesigns offer substantial functional advantages during the product use phase (e.g., lightweight part designs and part remanufacturing). Important pending research questions include the LCI of AM feedstock production, supply-chain consequences, and health and safety issues relating to AM. Keywords: additive manufacturing; energy efficiency; industrial ecology; resource efficiency; sustainability; 3D printingen_US
dc.publisherWiley Blackwellen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/JIEC.12629en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceWileyen_US
dc.titleEnvironmental Dimensions of Additive Manufacturing: Mapping Application Domains and Their Environmental Implicationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationKellens, Karel et al. “Environmental Dimensions of Additive Manufacturing: Mapping Application Domains and Their Environmental Implications.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 21, S1 (August 2017): S49–S68 © 2017 The Authorsen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorGutowski, Timothy G
dc.relation.journalJournal of Industrial Ecologyen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2018-11-28T18:15:58Z
dspace.orderedauthorsKellens, Karel; Baumers, Martin; Gutowski, Timothy G.; Flanagan, William; Lifset, Reid; Duflou, Joost R.en_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7019-6887
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record