Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPaik, Jamie
dc.contributor.authorShepherd, Robert
dc.contributor.authorTrimmer, Barry A.
dc.contributor.authorMessner, William C.
dc.contributor.authorKim, Sangbae
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-18T18:34:46Z
dc.date.available2018-12-18T18:34:46Z
dc.date.issued2014-06
dc.identifier.issn2169-5172
dc.identifier.issn2169-5180
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/119689
dc.description.abstractAnimals and autonomous robots need to carry their own fuel (unlike plants, they do not generate usable energy from their surroundings). Animals typically exceed the normal endurance and range of all our current untethered robots. As an obvious example, humans have tremendous burst speed (less than 10 seconds to run 100 meters) and endurance (running a 26-mile marathon), and they can continue to do everyday activities without refueling (eating) for several days. The typical cost of transport for humans is about 0.2. In comparison, most robots operate for less than 1 hour on their carried fuel; the cost of transport is 15 or 20 times more than that for animals. An intriguing insight is that passive dynamic walkers can approach the human cost of transport (the Cornell Ranger can walk nonstop for 65 km), but this is a single optimized task (walking) with none of the versatility of an animal that can step over objects and operate on varied terrain. What it does illustrate is that structures (and by extension, material properties) can be exploited to ‘‘get the most’’ out of a given fuel source. Surely, this is what animals do on a continuous basis. What do we need to do to give our robots similar capabilities? In particular, what are the special demands, advantages, and limitations of fuel storage and usage in soft robots? To begin exploring some of these issues and to also stimulate a larger dialog in the robot community, the following discussion has been compiled from a series of questions posed to the participants.en_US
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert Incen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1089/SORO.2014.1501en_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceMary Ann Lieberten_US
dc.titleEnergy for Biomimetic Robots: Challenges and Solutionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationMessner, Participants: William C., Jamie Paik, Robert Shepherd, Sangbae Kim, and Barry A. Trimmer. “Energy for Biomimetic Robots: Challenges and Solutions.” Soft Robotics 1, no. 2 (June 2014): 106–109.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorKim, Sangbae
dc.relation.journalSoft Roboticsen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2018-12-10T16:44:53Z
dspace.orderedauthorsMessner, Participants: William C.; Paik, Jamie; Shepherd, Robert; Kim, Sangbae; Trimmer, Barry A.en_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0218-6801
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICYen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record