Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBenis, Khadija
dc.contributor.authorGashgari, R.
dc.contributor.authorAlsaati, A.
dc.contributor.authorReinhart, Christoph
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-30T14:20:58Z
dc.date.available2019-08-30T14:20:58Z
dc.date.issued2018-12
dc.identifier.issn1755-7437
dc.identifier.issn1755-7445
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/122030
dc.description.abstractAllowing for significant water savings and year-round yields, Controlled-Environment Agriculture (CEA) is oftentimes portrayed as a sustainable alternative to conventional farming, and its practice in urban areas as a food, income and employment generator is expanding worldwide. Particularly in today's fast growing cities, where economic strength is buying food security through imports, a largescale implementation of such practices should be further investigated as potential contributors - not only to food security but also to self-sufficiency - for the production of horticultural crops. However, further than quantifying the potential for food self-sufficiency of cities through urban cultivation, there is a crucial need for assessing the extent to which such scenarios are effectively more sustainable than existing supply chains. For that purpose, this paper presents the Urban Foodprints (UF) methodology, a fundamental preliminary step in the sustainability assessment of high-yield urban agriculture, consisting of collecting and integrating data on the existing supply chain, to be used as a baseline scenario in the environmental performance analysis. Through the case of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, where harsh climatic conditions, a heavy reliance on food imports and a growing population constitute major threats to food security, the UF method is described and applied to the top four consumed horticultural crops - watermelon, tomato, onion and carrot. The environmental sustainability of high-yield urban agriculture in Riyadh is subsequently assessed for tomato, as a comparison of the resulting city's current foodprint for the crop vs. a scenario of local production in CEA urban farms. Results show that urban production in high-yield greenhouses has the potential to reduce Global Warming Potential (GWP) by 9%. However, while water savings contribute greatly to reducing irrigation-related emissions and food miles are considerably reduced, the energy needs of the greenhouses are significantly higher than the baseline. This outcome may be improved by enhancing the envelope of the farms to reduce overheating. Keywords: baseline scenario; Controlled-Environment Agriculture (CEA); sustainability assessment; Urban Foodprint; urban food systemen_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWITPRESS LTDen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2495/dne-v13-n4-349-360en_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceWIT Pressen_US
dc.titleUrban foodprints (UF) – Establishing baseline scenarios for the sustainability assessment of high-yield urban agricultureen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationBenis, K. et al. "Urban Footprints (UF) - Establishing baseline scenarios for the sustainability assessment of high-yield urban agriculture." International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics 13, 4 (December 2018): 349-360 © 2018 WITPRESS LTDen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architectureen_US
dc.relation.journalInternational Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamicsen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2019-08-08T14:47:03Z
dspace.date.submission2019-08-08T14:47:05Z
mit.journal.volume13en_US
mit.journal.issue4en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record