Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShi, Rebecca D.
dc.contributor.authorRedman, Patrick
dc.contributor.authorGhose, Dipanwita
dc.contributor.authorHwang, Hongik
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Yan
dc.contributor.authorRen, Xiaobai
dc.contributor.authorDing, Lei J.
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Mingna
dc.contributor.authorJones, Kendrick
dc.contributor.authorXu, Weifeng
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-07T19:38:21Z
dc.date.available2019-10-07T19:38:21Z
dc.date.issued2017-12
dc.date.submitted2017-11
dc.identifier.issn2373-2822
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/122456
dc.description.abstractShank proteins, one of the principal scaffolds in the postsynaptic density (PSD) of the glutamatergic synapses, have been associated with autism spectrum disorders and neuropsychiatric diseases. However, it is not known whether different Shank family proteins have distinct functions in regulating synaptic transmission, and how they differ from other scaffold proteins in this aspect. Here, we investigate the role of Shanks in regulating glutamatergic synaptic transmission at rat hippocampal SC-CA1 synapses, using lentivirus-mediated knockdown and molecular replacement combined with dual whole-cell patch clamp in hippocampal slice culture. In line with previous findings regarding PSD-MAGUK scaffold manipulation, we found that loss of scaffold proteins via knockdown of Shank1 or Shank2, but not Shank3, led to a reduction of the number but not the unitary response of AMPAR containing synapses. Only when both Shank1 and Shank2 were knocked down, were both the number and the unitary response of active synapses reduced. This reduction was accompanied by a decrease in NMDAR-mediated synaptic response, indicating more profound deficits in synaptic transmission. Molecular replacement with Shank2 and Shank3c rescued the synaptic transmission to the basal level, and the intact sterile _-motif (SAM) of Shank proteins is required for maintaining glutamatergic synaptic transmission. We also found that altered neural activity did not influence the effect of Shank1 or Shank2 knockdown on AMPAR synaptic transmission, in direct contrast to the activity dependence of the effect of PSD-95 knockdown, revealing differential interaction between activity-dependent signaling and scaffold protein families in regulating synaptic AMPAR function. Keywords: ASD; bicuculline; excitatory; hippocampus; mini; Prosap1en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant MH080310)en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Neuroscienceen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1523/eneuro.0163-15.2017en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceSociety for Neurocienceen_US
dc.titleShank Proteins Differentially Regulate Synaptic Transmissionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationShi, Rebecca et al. "Shank Proteins Differentially Regulate Synaptic Transmission." eNeuro 4, 6 (December 2017): ENEURO.0163-15.2017 © 2017 Shi et alen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPicower Institute for Learning and Memoryen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biologyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemistryen_US
dc.relation.journaleNeuroen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2019-10-04T18:45:30Z
dspace.date.submission2019-10-04T18:45:32Z
mit.journal.volume4en_US
mit.journal.issue6en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record