Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLieberman, Mia
dc.contributor.authorMadden, Carolyn
dc.contributor.authorMa, Eric Jinglong
dc.contributor.authorFox, James G
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-21T15:23:27Z
dc.date.available2019-10-21T15:23:27Z
dc.date.issued2018-01
dc.identifier.issn1559-6109
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/122643
dc.description.abstractSmartphones are ubiquitous devices that offer a variety of useful applications for human and veterinary medical professionals and the biomedical research community. Smartphones can serve as fomites and potentially transmit pathogens, including bacterial species such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The goal of this study was to evaluate 6 methods to decrease aerobic bacterial colonies on smartphones, including two 254-nm UVC devices, 70% ethanol spray, quaternary ammonium disinfectant spray, sodium hypochlorite-impregnated wipes, and delicate-task wipes. All methods were individually effective at decreasing aerobic bacterial counts after sanitization. In addition, 254-nm UVC devices providing a dose of 60 mJ/cm², with UVC bulbs exposing both sides of the smartphone, were an effective nonliquid method for smartphone sanitization.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant T32-OD010978)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant P30-ES002109)en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAmerican Association for Laboratory Animal Science (AALAS)en_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/aalas/jaalas/2018/00000057/00000001/art00004#en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.source421331en_US
dc.titleEvaluation of 6 Methods for Aerobic Bacterial Sanitization of Smartphonesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationLieberman, Mia T. et al. "Evaluation of 6 Methods for Aerobic Bacterial Sanitization of Smartphones." Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science 57, 1 (January 2018): 24-29 © 2018 American Association for Laboratory Animal Science (AALAS)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Division of Comparative Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biological Engineeringen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Scienceen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2019-10-17T13:38:37Z
dspace.date.submission2019-10-17T13:38:40Z
mit.journal.volume57en_US
mit.journal.issue1en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record