Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStone, Kane Adam
dc.contributor.authorSolomon, Susan
dc.contributor.authorKinnison, Douglas E.
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-05T16:34:18Z
dc.date.available2019-11-05T16:34:18Z
dc.date.issued2018-05
dc.date.submitted2018-05
dc.identifier.issn0094-8276
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/122774
dc.description.abstractAs ozone depleting substances decline, stratospheric ozone is displaying signs of healing in the Antarctic lower stratosphere. Here we focus on higher altitudes and the global stratosphere. Two key processes that can influence ozone recovery are evaluated: dynamical variability and solar proton events (SPEs). A nine‐member ensemble of free‐running simulations indicates that dynamical variability dominates the relatively small ozone recovery signal over 1998–2016 in the subpolar lower stratosphere, particularly near the tropical tropopause. The absence of observed recovery there to date is therefore not unexpected. For the upper stratosphere, high latitudes (50–80°N/S) during autumn and winter show the largest recovery. Large halogen‐induced odd oxygen loss there provides a fingerprint of seasonal sensitivity to chlorine trends. However, we show that SPEs also have a profound effect on ozone trends within this region since 2000. Thus, accounting for SPEs is important for detection of recovery in the upper stratosphere. Keywords: ozone; recovery; stratosphere; variabilityen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation (Grant ACD-1539972)en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)en_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2018gl077955en_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceProf. Solomon via Chris Sherratten_US
dc.titleOn the Identification of Ozone Recoveryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationStone, Kane A. et al. “On the Identification of Ozone Recovery.” Geophysical Research Letters 45, 10 (May 2018): 5158–5165 © 2018 American Geophysical Unionen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemistryen_US
dc.contributor.approverSolomon, Susanen_US
dc.relation.journalGeophysical Research Lettersen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsStone, Kane A.; Solomon, Susan; Kinnison, Douglas E.en_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dspace.date.submission2019-04-04T10:38:18Z
mit.journal.volume45en_US
mit.journal.issue10en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICYen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record