Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSpencer, Jack
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-19T20:19:24Z
dc.date.available2019-11-19T20:19:24Z
dc.date.issued2018-05-18
dc.identifier.issn0029-4624
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/122971
dc.description.abstractA crystal ball, in Hall’s (1994) sense, need be neither round nor crystalline. The world is said to contain crystal balls whenever the present carries news of the as-yet-undetermined parts of the future. Images appearing in spheres made of magical quartz might be crystal balls, in the relevant sense, but so too might arrangements of magical tea leaves or neural states in the brains of time-travelers or clairvoyants. Many philosophers believe that crystal balls are metaphysically possible. In this essay, I argue that they are not.en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell (Firm)en_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1111/nous.12252en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceMIT web domainen_US
dc.titleNo Crystal Ballsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationSpencer, Jack. "No Crystal Balls." Noûs (2018): 1-21 © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophyen_US
dc.relation.journalNoûsen_US
dc.eprint.versionOriginal manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/NonPeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2019-11-05T18:44:19Z
dspace.date.submission2019-11-05T18:44:23Z
mit.journal.volume0en_US
mit.journal.issue0en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record