| dc.contributor.author | Yablo, Stephen | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-10T16:23:55Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-01-10T16:23:55Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017-04 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2016-02 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2474-0500 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2474-0519 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/123433 | |
| dc.description.abstract | An undemanding claim ϕ sometimes implies, or seems to, a more demanding one ψ. Some have posited, to explain this, a confusion between ϕ and ϕ*, an analogue of ϕ that does not imply ψ. If-thenists take ϕ* to be If ψ then ϕ. Incrementalism is the form of if-thenism that construes If ψ then ϕ as the surplus content of ϕ over ψ (ϕ∼ψ). The paper argues that it is the only form of if-thenism that stands a chance of being correct. | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Informa UK Limited | en_US |
| dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1080/24740500.2017.1346423 | en_US |
| dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike | en_US |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | en_US |
| dc.source | Prof. Yablo via Mark Szarko | en_US |
| dc.title | If-Thenism | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Stephen Yablo. "If-Thenism." Australasian Philosophical Review 1, 2 (April 2017): 115-132 © 2017 Australasian Association of Philosophy | en_US |
| dc.contributor.department | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy | en_US |
| dc.relation.journal | Australasian Philosophical Review | en_US |
| dc.eprint.version | Author's final manuscript | en_US |
| dc.type.uri | http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle | en_US |
| eprint.status | http://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerReviewed | en_US |
| dspace.date.submission | 2020-01-10T13:41:12Z | |
| mit.journal.volume | 1 | en_US |
| mit.journal.issue | 2 | en_US |
| mit.metadata.status | Complete | |
