Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOno, Shuhei
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-24T15:10:14Z
dc.date.available2020-04-24T15:10:14Z
dc.date.issued2019-03
dc.date.submitted2019-01
dc.identifier.issn0267-9477
dc.identifier.issn1364-5544
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/124850
dc.description.abstractDespite widespread applications of sulfur isotope mass-independent fractionation (MIF) signals for probing terrestrial and extra-terrestrial environments, there has been no international sulfur isotope reference material available for normalization of Δ33S and Δ36S data. International reference materials to anchor isotope values are useful for interlaboratory data comparisons and are needed to evaluate, e.g., whether issues exist associated with blanks and mass spectrometry when using different analytical approaches. We synthesized two sodium sulfate samples enriched in 33S with different magnitudes, and termed them S-MIF-1 and S-MIF-2, respectively. The sulfur isotopic compositions of these two samples were measured in five different laboratories using two distinct techniques to place them on the V-CDT scale for δ34S and a provisional V-CDT scale for Δ33S and Δ36S. We obtained average δ34S values of S-MIF-1 = 10.26 ± 0.22‰ and S-MIF-2 = 21.53 ± 0.26‰ (1σ, versus V-CDT). The average Δ33S and Δ36S values of S-MIF-1 were determined to be 9.54 ± 0.09‰ and -0.11 ± 0.25‰, respectively, while the average Δ33S and Δ36S values of S-MIF-2 are 11.39 ± 0.08‰ and -0.33 ± 0.13‰ (1σ, versus V-CDT). The lack of variation among the interlaboratory isotopic values suggests sufficient homogeneity of S-MIF-1 and S-MIF-2, especially for Δ33S. Although additional measurements may be needed to ensure the accuracy of the isotopic compositions of S-MIF-1 and S-MIF-2, they can serve as working standards for routine Δ33S analysis to improve data consistency, and have the potential to serve as secondary sulfur isotope reference materials to address issues such as scale contraction/expansion and for normalization and reporting of Δ33S and Δ36S between laboratories. For the same reasons as listed for sulfur isotopes, the same standards were also artificially enriched in 17O. The calibration is still in progress but first estimations gave Δ17O = 3.3 ± 0.3‰ with unassigned δ18O. ©2019en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherRoyal Society of Chemistry (RSC)en_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1039/C8JA00451Jen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 3.0 unported licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/en_US
dc.sourceRoyal Society of Chemistry (RSC)en_US
dc.titleIntercomparison measurements of two 33 S-enriched sulfur isotope standardsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationGen, L., et al., "Intercomparison measurements of two 33 S-enriched sulfur isotope standards." Journal of analytical atomic spectrometry 34, 6 (Mar. 2019): no. 1263 doi 10.1039/C8JA00451J ©2019 Author(s)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of analytical atomic spectrometryen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2020-04-06T19:38:11Z
dspace.orderedauthorsL. Gen; J. Savarino; N. Caillon; E. Gautier; J. Farquhar; J.W. Dottin III; N. Magalhaes; ˜S. Hattori; S. Ishino; N. Yoshida; F. Albarede; E. Albalat; P. Cartigny; Ono, Shuhei; M.H. Thiemenshen_US
dspace.date.submission2020-04-06T19:38:13Z
mit.journal.volume34en_US
mit.journal.issue6en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record