Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSaxe, Rebecca R.
dc.contributor.authorHoulihan, Sean Dae
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-11T18:28:17Z
dc.date.available2020-05-11T18:28:17Z
dc.date.issued2017-03
dc.identifier.issn2352-2518
dc.identifier.issn2352-250X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/125152
dc.description.abstractSensitivity to others’ emotions is foundational for many aspects of human life, yet computational models do not currently approach the sensitivity and specificity of human emotion knowledge. Perception of isolated physical expressions largely supplies ambiguous, low-dimensional, and noisy information about others’ emotional states. By contrast, observers attribute specific granular emotions to another person based on inferences of how she interprets (or ‘appraises’) external events in relation to her other mental states (goals, beliefs, moral values, costs). These attributions share neural mechanisms with other reasoning about minds. Situating emotion concepts in a formal model of people's intuitive theories about other minds is necessary to effectively capture humans’ fine-grained emotion understanding.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation (U.S.) (CCF-1231216)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant 1R01 MH096914-01A1)en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.COPSYC.2017.04.019en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.titleFormalizing emotion concepts within a Bayesian model of theory of minden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationSaxe, Rebecca, and Sean Dae Houlihan. “Formalizing Emotion Concepts within a Bayesian Model of Theory of Mind.” Current Opinion in Psychology 17 (October 2017): 15–21.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.journalCurrent Opinion in Psychologyen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2019-10-03T18:03:06Z
dspace.date.submission2019-10-03T18:03:07Z
mit.journal.volume17en_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record