Replies to Cameron, Wilson and Leininger
Author(s)
Skow, Bradford
DownloadAccepted version (95.36Kb)
Terms of use
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Ross Cameron thinks that MST-Supertime, MST-Supertense and MST-Time are defective as versions of the moving spotlight theory and goes on to describe what he thinks they are missing. But I don’t think they are defective; and what Cameron says is missing from these theories is actually present in a version of MST-Time that appears in the book.
Cameron thinks that MST-Supertime, to start with, is inconsistent, and so the worst of the lot. He thinks McTaggart’s argument shows it to be inconsistent. But the theory is not inconsistent. We can draw a picture of what reality is like according to the theory, and the picture doesn’t confuse us the way M. C. Escher's pictures of inconsistent situations do. Figure 1 contains such a picture: the arrows...
Date issued
2018-01Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and PhilosophyJournal
Analysis
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Citation
Skow, Bradford. "Replies to Cameron, Wilson and Leininger." Analysis 78, 1 (January 2018): 128-138 © 2018 The Author
Version: Author's final manuscript
ISSN
0003-2638
1467-8284