Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRivest, Ronald L
dc.contributor.authorStark, Philip B.
dc.contributor.authorPerumal, Zara (Zara Alexandra)
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-13T20:57:36Z
dc.date.available2020-05-13T20:57:36Z
dc.date.issued2017-11
dc.date.submitted2017-04
dc.identifier.isbn9783319702773
dc.identifier.isbn9783319702780
dc.identifier.issn0302-9743
dc.identifier.issn1611-3349
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/125229
dc.description.abstractWe propose a family of novel social choice functions. Our goal is to explore social choice functions for which ease of auditing is a primary design goal, instead of being ignored or left as a puzzle to solve later. Our proposal, “BatchVote,” creates a social choice function f from an arbitrary “inner” social choice function g, such as instant-runoff voting (IRV), and an integer B, the number of batches. We aim to preserve flexibility by allowing g to be arbitrary, while providing the ease of auditing of a plurality election. To compute the winner of an election of n votes, the social choice function f partitions the votes into B batches of roughly the same size, pseudorandomly. The social choice function g is applied to each batch. The election winner, according to f, is the weighted plurality winner for the B outcomes, where the weight of each batch is the number of votes it contains. The social choice function f may be viewed as an “interpolation” between plurality (which is easily auditable) and g (which need not be). Auditing is simple by design: we can view f as being a (weighted) plurality election by B “supervoters,” where the bth supervoter’s vote is determined by applying g to the votes in batch b, and the weight of her vote is the number of votes in her batch. Since plurality elections are easy to audit, the election output can be audited by checking a random sample of “supervotes” against the corresponding paper records.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCenter for Science of Information (Grant CCF-0939370)en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer International Publishingen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70278-0_20en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceOther repositoryen_US
dc.titleBatchVote: Voting Rules Designed for Auditabilityen_US
dc.typeBooken_US
dc.identifier.citationRivest, Ronald L. et al. "BatchVote: Voting Rules Designed for Auditability." International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security, April 2017, Sliema, Malta, Springer, November 2017. © 2017 International Financial Cryptography Associationen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratoryen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Scienceen_US
dc.relation.journalInternational Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Securityen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/ConferencePaperen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/NonPeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2019-07-03T13:00:55Z
dspace.date.submission2019-07-03T13:00:56Z
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record