Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKhoo, Justin Donald
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-09T20:13:54Z
dc.date.available2020-06-09T20:13:54Z
dc.date.issued2018-07
dc.identifier.issn1573-0964
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/125750
dc.description.abstractDisjunctive antecedent conditionals (DACs)—conditionals of the form if A or B, C—sometimes seem to entail both of their simplifications (if A, C; if B, C) and sometimes seem not to. I argue that this behavior reveals a genuine ambiguity in DACs. Along the way, I discuss a new observation about the role of focal stress in distinguishing the two interpretations of DACs. I propose a new theory, according to which the surface form of a DAC underdetermines its logical form: on one possible logical form, if A or B, C does entail both of its simplifications, while on the other, it does not.en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Nature America, Incen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/S11229-018-1877-6en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceOther repositoryen_US
dc.titleDisjunctive antecedent conditionalsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationKhoo, Justin, "Disjunctive antecedent conditionals." Synthese 2018 (July 2018): doi 10.1007/S11229-018-1877-6 ©2018 Author(s)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
dc.relation.journalSyntheseen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2019-11-05T16:11:53Z
dspace.date.submission2019-11-05T16:11:57Z
mit.journal.volume2018en_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record