| dc.contributor.author | Yablo, Stephen | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-09T21:28:30Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-06-09T21:28:30Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2474-0519 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/125756 | |
| dc.description.abstract | I am hugely grateful for these provocative and illuminating comments. My thanks to all N commentators. I will have something to say about each contribution, but the overall organization will be thematic. A reminder first of the issues we’re wrestling with. [First paragraph] | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Informa UK Limited | en_US |
| dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1080/24740500.2017.1346424 | en_US |
| dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike | en_US |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | en_US |
| dc.source | Other repository | en_US |
| dc.title | Replies to Comments on If-Thenism | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Yablo, Stephen, "Replies to Comments on If-Thenism." Australasian Philosophical Review 1, 2 (2017): p.212-27 doi 10.1080/24740500.2017.1346424 ©2017 Author(s) | en_US |
| dc.contributor.department | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy | |
| dc.relation.journal | Australasian Philosophical Review | en_US |
| dc.eprint.version | Original manuscript | en_US |
| dc.type.uri | http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle | en_US |
| eprint.status | http://purl.org/eprint/status/NonPeerReviewed | en_US |
| dc.date.updated | 2019-11-05T18:56:37Z | |
| dspace.date.submission | 2019-11-05T18:56:39Z | |
| mit.journal.volume | 1 | en_US |
| mit.journal.issue | 2 | en_US |
| mit.metadata.status | Complete | |
