Replies to Cameron, Wilson, and Leininger
Name
analysis-replies.pdf
Description
Accepted version
Size
95.36 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
2ba445e68e1c3294aaa6b1455d0a6311
Author(s)
Skow, Bradford
Alternative Title
Summary: Objective Becoming by Bradford Skow
Date Issued
January 2018
Journal
Analysis
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Citation
Skow, Bradford. "Summary: Objective Becoming by Bradford Skow." Analysis 78, 1 (January 2018): 93-96 ©2018 Author(s)
Version
Author's final manuscript
Abstract
Does time pass? Well of course it does. Iconoclasts and gadflies might deny it, but (as my parents used to say) they’re just looking for negative attention. It is therefore frustrating to be told, as I have been, that one’s theory of time is false because it leaves out the passage of time. In a way, Objective Becoming (Skow 2015) is a defense of the theory I prefer against this accusation. That theory is the block universe theory of time.
Description
For a symposium on Objective Becoming in Analysis Reviews.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anx153
