MIT Libraries logoDSpace@MIT

MIT
View Item 
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Open Access Articles
  • MIT Open Access Articles
  • View Item
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Open Access Articles
  • MIT Open Access Articles
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Replies to Cameron, Wilson, and Leininger

Author(s)
Skow, Bradford
Thumbnail
DownloadAccepted version (95.36Kb)
Alternative title
Summary: Objective Becoming by Bradford Skow
Terms of use
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Does time pass? Well of course it does. Iconoclasts and gadflies might deny it, but (as my parents used to say) they’re just looking for negative attention. It is therefore frustrating to be told, as I have been, that one’s theory of time is false because it leaves out the passage of time. In a way, Objective Becoming (Skow 2015) is a defense of the theory I prefer against this accusation. That theory is the block universe theory of time.
Description
For a symposium on Objective Becoming in Analysis Reviews.
Date issued
2018-01
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/125851
Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
Journal
Analysis
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Citation
Skow, Bradford. "Summary: Objective Becoming by Bradford Skow." Analysis 78, 1 (January 2018): 93-96 ©2018 Author(s)
Version: Author's final manuscript
ISSN
1467-8284

Collections
  • MIT Open Access Articles

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

Login

Statistics

OA StatisticsStatistics by CountryStatistics by Department
MIT Libraries
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
MIT
Content created by the MIT Libraries, CC BY-NC unless otherwise noted. Notify us about copyright concerns.