Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWu, Jinlong
dc.contributor.authorXiao, Heng
dc.contributor.authorSun, Rui
dc.contributor.authorWang, Qiqi
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-18T14:08:25Z
dc.date.available2020-06-18T14:08:25Z
dc.date.issued2019-04
dc.identifier.issn0022-1120
dc.identifier.issn1469-7645
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/125862
dc.description.abstractPress. Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations with turbulence closure models continue to play important roles in industrial flow simulations. However, the commonly used linear eddy-viscosity models are intrinsically unable to handle flows with non-equilibrium turbulence (e.g. flows with massive separation). Reynolds stress models, on the other hand, are plagued by their lack of robustness. Recent studies in plane channel flows found that even substituting Reynolds stresses with errors below 0.5 % from direct numerical simulation databases into RANS equations leads to velocities with large errors (up to 35 %). While such an observation may have only marginal relevance to traditional Reynolds stress models, it is disturbing for the recently emerging data-driven models that treat the Reynolds stress as an explicit source term in the RANS equations, as it suggests that the RANS equations with such models can be ill-conditioned. So far, a rigorous analysis of the condition of such models is still lacking. As such, in this work we propose a metric based on local condition number function for a priori evaluation of the conditioning of the RANS equations. We further show that the ill-conditioning cannot be explained by the global matrix condition number of the discretized RANS equations. Comprehensive numerical tests are performed on turbulent channel flows at various Reynolds numbers and additionally on two complex flows, i.e. flow over periodic hills, and flow in a square duct. Results suggest that the proposed metric can adequately explain observations in previous studies, i.e. deteriorated model conditioning with increasing Reynolds number and better conditioning of the implicit treatment of the Reynolds stress compared to the explicit treatment. This metric can play critical roles in the future development of data-driven turbulence models by enforcing the conditioning as a requirement on these models.en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCambridge University Press (CUP)en_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2019.205en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourcearXiven_US
dc.titleReynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations with explicit data-driven Reynolds stress closure can be ill-conditioneden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationWu, Jinlong et al. "Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations with explicit data-driven Reynolds stress closure can be ill-conditioned."Journal of Fluid Mechanics 869 (June 2019): 553-586 © 2019 Cambridge Universityen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronauticsen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Fluid Mechanicsen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2019-11-01T17:23:02Z
dspace.date.submission2019-11-01T17:23:07Z
mit.journal.volume869en_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record