Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPackiasabapathy, Senthil
dc.contributor.authorPrasad, Varesh
dc.contributor.authorRangasamy, Valluvan
dc.contributor.authorPopok, David
dc.contributor.authorXu, Xinling
dc.contributor.authorNovack, Victor
dc.contributor.authorSubramaniam, Balachundhar
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-30T14:03:29Z
dc.date.available2020-06-30T14:03:29Z
dc.date.issued2020-03
dc.identifier.issn1471-2253
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/126024
dc.description.abstractBackground Recent literature suggests a significant association between blood pressure variability (BPV) and postoperative outcomes after cardiac surgery. However, its outcome prediction ability remains unclear. Current prediction models use static preoperative patient factors. We explored the ability of Poincaré plots and coefficient of variation (CV) by measuring intraoperative BPV in predicting adverse outcomes. Methods In this retrospective, observational, cohort study, 3687 adult patients (> 18 years) undergoing cardiac surgery requiring cardio-pulmonary bypass from 2008 to 2014 were included. Blood pressure variability was computed by Poincare plots and CV. Standard descriptors (SD) SD1, SD2 were measured with Poincare plots by ellipse fitting technique. The outcomes analyzed were the 30-day mortality and postoperative renal failure. Logistic regression models adjusted for preoperative and surgical factors were constructed to evaluate the association between BPV parameters and outcomes. C-statistics were used to analyse the predictive ability. Results Analysis found that, 99 (2.7%) patients died within 30 days and 105 (2.8%) patients suffered from in-hospital renal failure. Logistic regression models including BPV parameters (standard descriptors from Poincare plots and CV) performed poorly in predicting postoperative 30-day mortality and renal failure [Concordance(C)-Statistic around 0.5]. They did not add any significant value to the standard STS risk score [C-statistic: STS alone 0.7, STS + BPV parmeters 0.7]. Conclusions In conclusion, BP variability computed from Poincare plots and CV were not predictive of mortality and renal failure in cardiac surgical patients. Patient comorbid conditions and other preoperative factors are still the gold standard for outcome prediction. Future directions include analysis of dynamic parameters such as complexity of physiological signals in identifying high risk patients and tailoring management accordingly.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (Grant GM 098406)en_US
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLCen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-00972-5en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attributionen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceBioMed Centralen_US
dc.titleCardiac surgical outcome prediction by blood pressure variability indices Poincaré plot and coefficient of variation: a retrospective studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationPackiasabapathy, Senthil et al. "Cardiac surgical outcome prediction by blood pressure variability indices Poincaré plot and coefficient of variation: a retrospective study." BMC Anesthesiology 20,1 (March 2020): 56 © 2020 BioMed Central Ltden_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Medical Engineering & Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.departmentHarvard University--MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technologyen_US
dc.relation.journalBMC Anesthesiologyen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2020-06-26T11:01:52Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dspace.date.submission2020-06-26T11:01:50Z
mit.journal.volume20en_US
mit.journal.issue1en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record