Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorForner-Cordero, Arturo
dc.contributor.authorPinho, João P
dc.contributor.authorUmemura, Guilherme
dc.contributor.authorLourenço, João C
dc.contributor.authorMezêncio, Bruno
dc.contributor.authorItiki, Cinthia
dc.contributor.authorKrebs, Hermano Igo
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-17T20:34:39Z
dc.date.available2020-07-17T20:34:39Z
dc.date.issued2019-12-23
dc.identifier.issn1743-0003
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/126254
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Different types of sound cues have been used to adapt the human gait rhythm. We investigated whether young healthy volunteers followed subliminal metronome rhythm changes during gait. METHODS: Twenty-two healthy adults walked at constant speed on a treadmill following a metronome sound cue (period 566 msec). The metronome rhythm was then either increased or decreased, without informing the subjects, at 1 msec increments or decrements to reach, respectively, a low (596 msec) or a high frequency (536 msec) plateaus. After 30 steps at one of these isochronous conditions, the rhythm returned to the original period with decrements or increments of 1 msec. Motion data were recorded with an optical measurement system to determine footfall. The relative phase between sound cue (stimulus) and foot contact (response) were compared. RESULTS: Gait was entrained to the rhythmic auditory stimulus and subjects subconsciously adapted the step time and length to maintain treadmill speed, while following the rhythm changes. In most cases there was a lead error: the foot contact occurred before the sound cue. The mean error or the absolute mean relative phase increased during the isochronous high (536 msec) or low frequencies (596 msec). CONCLUSION: These results showed that the gait period is strongly “entrained” with the first metronome rhythm while subjects still followed metronome changes with larger error. This suggests two processes: one slow-adapting, supraspinal oscillator with persistence that predicts the foot contact to occur ahead of the stimulus, and a second fast process linked to sensory inputs that adapts to the mismatch between peripheral sensory input (foot contact) and supraspinal sensory input (auditory rhythm).en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipOffice of Naval Research Global (Grants ONR-G 62909131278 and 62909141246)en_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1186/s12984-019-0632-7en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attributionen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceBioMed Centralen_US
dc.titleEffects of supraspinal feedback on human gait: rhythmic auditory distortionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationForner-Cordero, Arturo et al. "Effects of supraspinal feedback on human gait: rhythmic auditory distortion." Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 16 (Dec. 2019): no, 159 doi 10.1186/s12984-019-0632-7 ©2019 Author(s)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitationen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2020-06-26T11:05:04Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s).
dspace.date.submission2020-06-26T11:05:04Z
mit.journal.volume16en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record