Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFrid, Petrea
dc.contributor.authorDrake, Mattias
dc.contributor.authorGiese, A. K.
dc.contributor.authorWasselius, J.
dc.contributor.authorSchirmer, Markus
dc.contributor.authorDonahue, K. L.
dc.contributor.authorCloonan, L.
dc.contributor.authorIrie, R.
dc.contributor.authorBouts, M. J. R. J.
dc.contributor.authorMcIntosh, E. C.
dc.contributor.authorMocking, S. J. T.
dc.contributor.authorDalca, Adrian Vasile
dc.contributor.authorSridharan, Ramesh
dc.contributor.authorXu, H.
dc.contributor.authorGiralt-Steinhauer, E.
dc.contributor.authorHolmegaard, L.
dc.contributor.authorJood, K.
dc.contributor.authorRoquer, J.
dc.contributor.authorCole, J. W.
dc.contributor.authorMcArdle, P. F.
dc.contributor.authorBroderick, J. P.
dc.contributor.authorJimenez-Conde, J.
dc.contributor.authorJern, C.
dc.contributor.authorKissela, B. M.
dc.contributor.authorKleindorfer, D. O.
dc.contributor.authorLemmens, R.
dc.contributor.authorMeschia, J. F.
dc.contributor.authorRundek, T.
dc.contributor.authorSacco, R. L.
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, R.
dc.contributor.authorSharma, P.
dc.contributor.authorSlowik, A.
dc.contributor.authorThijs, V.
dc.contributor.authorWoo, D.
dc.contributor.authorWorrall, B. B.
dc.contributor.authorKittner, S. J.
dc.contributor.authorMitchell, B. D.
dc.contributor.authorPetersson, J.
dc.contributor.authorRosand, J.
dc.contributor.authorGolland, Polina
dc.contributor.authorWu, O.
dc.contributor.authorRost, N. S.
dc.contributor.authorLindgren, A.
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-27T20:06:52Z
dc.date.available2020-07-27T20:06:52Z
dc.date.issued2019-11
dc.date.submitted2019-10
dc.identifier.issn0340-5354
dc.identifier.issn1432-1459
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/126403
dc.description.abstractObjective Posterior circulation ischemic stroke (PCiS) constitutes 20–30% of ischemic stroke cases. Detailed information about differences between PCiS and anterior circulation ischemic stroke (ACiS) remains scarce. Such information might guide clinical decision making and prevention strategies. We studied risk factors and ischemic stroke subtypes in PCiS vs. ACiS and lesion location on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in PCiS. Methods Out of 3,301 MRIs from 12 sites in the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) Stroke Genetics Network (SiGN), we included 2,381 cases with acute DWI lesions. The definition of ACiS or PCiS was based on lesion location. We compared the groups using Chi-squared and logistic regression. Results PCiS occurred in 718 (30%) patients and ACiS in 1663 (70%). Diabetes and male sex were more common in PCiS vs. ACiS (diabetes 27% vs. 23%, p < 0.05; male sex 68% vs. 58%, p < 0.001). Both were independently associated with PCiS (diabetes, OR = 1.29; 95% CI 1.04–1.61; male sex, OR = 1.46; 95% CI 1.21–1.78). ACiS more commonly had large artery atherosclerosis (25% vs. 20%, p < 0.01) and cardioembolic mechanisms (17% vs. 11%, p < 0.001) compared to PCiS. Small artery occlusion was more common in PCiS vs. ACiS (20% vs. 14%, p < 0.001). Small artery occlusion accounted for 47% of solitary brainstem infarctions. Conclusion Ischemic stroke subtypes differ between the two phenotypes. Diabetes and male sex have a stronger association with PCiS than ACiS. Definitive MRI-based PCiS diagnosis aids etiological investigation and contributes additional insights into specific risk factors and mechanisms of injury in PCiS.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health NIBIB (Grant P41EB015902)en_US
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLCen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09613-5en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attributionen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceSpringer Berlin Heidelbergen_US
dc.titleDetailed phenotyping of posterior vs. anterior circulation ischemic stroke: a multi-center MRI studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationFrid, P. et al. "Detailed phenotyping of posterior vs. anterior circulation ischemic stroke: a multi-center MRI study." Journal of Neurology 267, 3 (March 2020): 649–658 © 2019 Springer Natureen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratoryen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Scienceen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Neurologyen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2020-06-26T12:35:02Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dspace.embargo.termsN
dspace.date.submission2020-06-26T12:35:02Z
mit.journal.volume267en_US
mit.journal.issue3en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record