Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLauder, Lucas
dc.contributor.authorEwen, Sebastian
dc.contributor.authorTzafriri, A Rami
dc.contributor.authorEdelman, Elazer R
dc.contributor.authorCremers, Bodo
dc.contributor.authorKulenthiran, Saarraaken
dc.contributor.authorUkena, Christian
dc.contributor.authorLinz, Dominik
dc.contributor.authorKindermann, Ingrid
dc.contributor.authorTsioufis, Costas
dc.contributor.authorScheller, Bruno
dc.contributor.authorBöhm, Michael
dc.contributor.authorMahfoud, Felix
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-30T02:04:55Z
dc.date.available2020-07-30T02:04:55Z
dc.date.issued2018-10
dc.date.submitted2018-02
dc.identifier.issn1553-8389
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/126444
dc.description.abstractBackground/purpose: Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) has been introduced to lower blood pressure (BP) and sympathetic activity in patients with uncontrolled hypertension with at best equivocal results. It has been postulated that anatomic and procedural elements introduce unaccounted variability and yet little is known of the impact of renal anatomy and procedural parameters on BP response to RDN. Methods/materials: Anatomical parameters such as length and diameter were analyzed by quantitative vascular analysis and the prevalence of accessory renal arteries and renal artery disease were documented in 150 patients with resistant hypertension undergoing bilateral RDN using a mono-electrode radiofrequency catheter (Symplicity Flex, Medtronic). Results: Accessory renal arteries and renal artery disease were present in 56 (37%) and 14 patients (9%), respectively. At 6-months, 24 h-ambulatory BP was reduced by 11/6 mm Hg (p < 0.001 for both). Change of systolic blood pressure (SBP) was not related to the presence of accessory renal arteries (p = 0.543) or renal artery disease (p = 0.598). Patients with at least one main renal artery diameter ≤ 4 mm had a more pronounced reduction of 24 h-ambulatory SBP compared to patients where both arteries were >4 mm (−19 vs. −10 mmHg; p = 0.038). Neither the length of the renal artery nor the number of RF ablations influenced 24 h-ambulatory BP reduction at 6 months. Conclusions: 24 h-ambulatory BP lowering was most pronounced in patients with smaller renal artery diameter but not related to renal artery length, accessory arteries or renal artery disease. Further, there was no dose-response relationship observed with increasing number of ablations. Condensed abstract: Because little is known of the impact of renal anatomy and procedural parameters on blood pressure (BP) response to renal denervation (RDN), anatomical and procedural data were analyzed in 150 patients undergoing bilateral RDN. BP lowering was most pronounced in patients with smaller renal artery diameter but not related to renal artery length, the presence of renal artery disease or accessory renal arteries. Further, there was no dose-response relationship observed with increasing number of ablations.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (Grant R01-GM49039)en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2018.02.016en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.titleAnatomical and procedural determinants of ambulatory blood pressure lowering following catheter-based renal denervation using radiofrequencyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationLauder, Lucas et al. "Anatomical and procedural determinants of ambulatory blood pressure lowering following catheter-based renal denervation using radiofrequency." Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine 19, 7, Part B (October 2018): 845-851 © 2018 Elsevieren_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Medical Engineering & Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.departmentHarvard University--MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technologyen_US
dc.relation.journalCardiovascular Revascularization Medicineen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2019-10-09T17:40:36Z
dspace.date.submission2019-10-09T17:40:38Z
mit.journal.volume19en_US
mit.journal.issue7en_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record