Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHoltz, David Michael
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Michael (Michael F.)
dc.contributor.authorBenzell, Seth Gordon
dc.contributor.authorCao, Cathy Y.
dc.contributor.authorRahimian, Mohammad Amin
dc.contributor.authorYang, Jeremy
dc.contributor.authorAllen, Jennifer
dc.contributor.authorCollis, Avinash
dc.contributor.authorMoehring, Alex
dc.contributor.authorSowrirajan, Tara
dc.contributor.authorGhosh, Dipayan
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Yunhao
dc.contributor.authorDhillon, Paramveer S.
dc.contributor.authorNicolaides, Christos
dc.contributor.authorEckles, Dean Griffin
dc.contributor.authorAral, Sinan K
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-12T14:22:24Z
dc.date.available2020-08-12T14:22:24Z
dc.date.issued2020-07
dc.identifier.issn0027-8424
dc.identifier.issn1091-6490
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/126538
dc.description.abstractSocial distancing is the core policy response to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). But, as federal, state and local governments begin opening businesses and relaxing shelter-in-place orders worldwide, we lack quantitative evidence on how policies in one region affect mobility and social distancing in other regions and the consequences of uncoordinated regional policies adopted in the presence of such spillovers. To investigate this concern, we combined daily, county-level data on shelter-in-place policies with movement data from over 27 million mobile devices, social network connections among over 220 million Facebook users, daily temperature and precipitation data from 62,000 weather stations, and county-level census data on population demographics to estimate the geographic and social network spillovers created by regional policies across the United States. Our analysis shows that the contact patterns of people in a given region are significantly influenced by the policies and behaviors of people in other, sometimes distant, regions. When just one-third of a state’s social and geographic peer states adopt shelter-in-place policies, it creates a reduction in mobility equal to the state’s own policy decisions. These spillovers are mediated by peer travel and distancing behaviors in those states. A simple analytical model calibrated with our empirical estimates demonstrated that the “loss from anarchy” in uncoordinated state policies is increasing in the number of noncooperating states and the size of social and geographic spillovers. These results suggest a substantial cost of uncoordinated government responses to COVID-19 when people, ideas, and media move across borders.en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherProceedings of the National Academy of Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1073/pnas.2009522117en_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourcePNASen_US
dc.titleInterdependence and the cost of uncoordinated responses to COVID-19en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationHoltz, David et al. "Interdependence and the cost of uncoordinated responses to COVID-19." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences published online (July 2020): doi 10.1073/pnas.2009522117 ©2020 Author(s)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentSloan School of Managementen_US
dc.relation.journalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciencesen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2020-08-11T17:40:04Z
dspace.date.submission2020-08-11T17:40:32Z
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICY
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record