Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKokkola, Harri
dc.contributor.authorKühn, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorLaakso, Anton
dc.contributor.authorBergman, Tommi
dc.contributor.authorLehtinen, Kari E. J.
dc.contributor.authorMielonen, Tero
dc.contributor.authorArola, Antti
dc.contributor.authorStadtler, Scarlet
dc.contributor.authorKorhonen, Hannele
dc.contributor.authorFerrachat, Sylvaine
dc.contributor.authorLohmann, Ulrike
dc.contributor.authorNeubauer, David
dc.contributor.authorTegen, Ina
dc.contributor.authorSiegenthaler-Le Drian, Colombe
dc.contributor.authorSchultz, Martin G.
dc.contributor.authorBey, Isabelle
dc.contributor.authorStier, Philip
dc.contributor.authorDaskalakis, Nikos
dc.contributor.authorHeald, Colette L.
dc.contributor.authorRomakkaniemi, Sami
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-17T16:05:43Z
dc.date.available2020-08-17T16:05:43Z
dc.date.issued2018-09
dc.date.submitted2018-08
dc.identifier.issn1991-9603
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/126621
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we present the implementation and evaluation of the aerosol microphysics module SALSA2.0 in the framework of the aerosol-chemistry-climate model ECHAM-HAMMOZ. It is an alternative microphysics module to the default modal microphysics scheme M7 in ECHAM-HAMMOZ. The SALSA2.0 implementation within ECHAM-HAMMOZ is evaluated against observations of aerosol optical properties, aerosol mass, and size distributions, comparing also to the skill of the M7 implementation. The largest differences between the implementation of SALSA2.0 and M7 are in the methods used for calculating microphysical processes, i.e., nucleation, condensation, coagulation, and hydration. These differences in the microphysics are reflected in the results so that the largest differences between SALSA2.0 and M7 are evident over regions where the aerosol size distribution is heavily modified by the microphysical processing of aerosol particles. Such regions are, for example, highly polluted regions and regions strongly affected by biomass burning. In addition, in a simulation of the 1991 Mt. Pinatubo eruption in which a stratospheric sulfate plume was formed, the global burden and the effective radii of the stratospheric aerosol are very different in SALSA2.0 and M7. While SALSA2.0 was able to reproduce the observed time evolution of the global burden of sulfate and the effective radii of stratospheric aerosol, M7 strongly overestimates the removal of coarse stratospheric particles and thus underestimates the effective radius of stratospheric aerosol. As the mode widths of M7 have been optimized for the troposphere and were not designed to represent stratospheric aerosol, the ability of M7 to simulate the volcano plume was improved by modifying the mode widths, decreasing the standard deviations of the accumulation and coarse modes from 1.59 and 2.0, respectively, to 1.2 similar to what was observed after the Mt. Pinatubo eruption. Overall, SALSA2.0 shows promise in improving the aerosol description of ECHAM-HAMMOZ and can be further improved by implementing methods for aerosol processes that are more suitable for the sectional method, e.g., size-dependent emissions for aerosol species and size-resolved wet deposition.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNOAA (Grant NA17RJ1231)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation (Grant ATM-0002035, ATM-0002698 and ATM04-01611)en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCopernicus GmbHen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3833-2018en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceCopernicus Publicationsen_US
dc.titleSALSA2.0: The sectional aerosol module of the aerosol–chemistry–climate model ECHAM6.3.0-HAM2.3-MOZ1.0en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationKokkola, Harri et al. "SALSA2.0: The sectional aerosol module of the aerosol–chemistry–climate model ECHAM6.3.0-HAM2.3-MOZ1.0." Geoscientific Model Development 11, 9 (September 2018): 3833–3863 © 2018 Author(s)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.journalGeoscientific Model Developmenten_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2020-05-27T17:30:37Z
dspace.date.submission2020-05-27T17:31:01Z
mit.journal.volume11en_US
mit.journal.issue9en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record