Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHartwig, Zachary Seth
dc.contributor.authorWhyte, Dennis G
dc.contributor.authorZucchetti, Massimo
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-24T14:17:56Z
dc.date.available2020-08-24T14:17:56Z
dc.date.issued2020-02
dc.identifier.issn0920-3796
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/126743
dc.description.abstractNowadays, Fusion Energy is one of the most important sources under study. During the last years, different designs of fusion reactors were considered. At the MIT, an innovative design was created: ARC, the Affordable Robust Compact reactor. It takes advantage of the innovative aspects of recent progress in fusion technology, such as high temperature superconductors, that permit to decrease the dimensions of the machine, reaching at the same time high magnetic fields. Our main goal is the low-activation analysis of possible structural materials for the vacuum vessel, which is designed as a single-piece placed between the first-wall and the tank that contains the breeding blanket. Due to its position, the vacuum vessel is subject to high neutron flux, which can activate it and cause the reduction of the component lifetime and decommissioning problems. The activation analysis was done also for the liquid breeder FLiBe, compared with Lithium-Lead. Codes used for the low-activation analysis were MCNP and FISPACT-II. The first one is based on a neutronics model and for each component a certain neutron flux is evaluated. For FISPACT-II, the main input is the composition of the analyzed material, the neutron flux and the irradiation time. Results from FISPACT-II are the time behavior of specific activity, contact dose rate. To assess suitable structural materials for the vacuum vessel, low-activation properties were considered. Vanadium alloys turn out to be one of the best alternatives to the present material, Inconel-718. Finally, isotopic tailoring and elemental substitution methods were applied. Here, the composition of each alloy is analyzed and critical isotopes or elements are eliminated or reduced. After the modifications, new simulations are done, and those leading to significant improvements in the final results are highlighted.en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.fusengdes.2020.111539en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceProf. Hartwig via Chris Sherratten_US
dc.titleARC reactor materials: Activation analysis and optimizationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationBocci, B. et al. “ARC reactor materials: Activation analysis and optimization.” Fusion Engineering and Design, 154 (February 2020): 111539 © 2020 The Author(s)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Plasma Science and Fusion Centeren_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Nuclear Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.relation.journalFusion Engineering and Designen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2020-08-21T14:41:15Z
dspace.date.submission2020-08-21T14:41:16Z
mit.journal.volume154en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record