Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSuh, Eun Suk
dc.contributor.authorSinha, Kaushik
dc.contributor.authorAhn, Jaemyung
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-09T16:32:42Z
dc.date.available2020-11-09T16:32:42Z
dc.date.issued2020-07
dc.date.submitted2020-06
dc.identifier.issn0934-9839
dc.identifier.issn1435-6066
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/128427
dc.description.abstractThe final architecture of a complex system reflect preferences of several value chain stakeholders on system attributes, also called “ilities”. Owing to differences in their individual roles and responsibilities, different stakeholders prefer different approaches to architect and decompose a system to optimize their attributes of interest. However, owing to increasing complexity of modern engineering systems, optimizing multiple attributes of complex systems has become challenging; moreover, very few researches have been published in this regard. Thus, to address this gap in available literature, this paper presents a multi-attribute optimization framework for complex system decomposition. The proposed framework primarily optimizes two attributes—system robustness (to the perspective of the stakeholder), and modularity—while system maintainability is considered an optimization constraint. Feasibility of the proposed framework has been demonstrated through a case study, wherein system attributes of three different mechanical clock models having different architectures were optimized.en_US
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLCen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00163-020-00342-9en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attributionen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceSpringer Londonen_US
dc.titleMulti-attribute optimization-based system decomposition considering several value chain stakeholder perspectivesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationSuh, Eun Suk et al. "Multi-attribute optimization-based system decomposition considering several value chain stakeholder perspectives." Research in Engineering Design 31, 4 (July 2020): 411–428 © 2020 The Author(s)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Sociotechnical Systems Research Centeren_US
dc.relation.journalResearch in Engineering Designen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2020-10-04T03:24:48Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dspace.embargo.termsN
dspace.date.submission2020-10-04T03:24:47Z
mit.journal.volume31en_US
mit.journal.issue4en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record