dc.contributor.author | Ezzeddine, Rana | |
dc.contributor.author | Frebel, Anna L. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-11-30T18:43:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-11-30T18:43:13Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-01 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0004-637X | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/128688 | |
dc.description.abstract | We present results from an observing campaign to identify low-metallicity stars in the Best & Brightest Survey. From medium-resolution (R ∼ 1200-2000) spectroscopy of 857 candidates, we estimate the stellar atmospheric parameters (Teff, log, g, and [Fe/H]), as well as carbon and α-element abundances. We find that 69% of the observed stars have ≤ -1.0, 39% have ≤ -2.0, and 2% have ≤ -3.0. There are also 133 carbon-enhanced metal-poor (CEMP) stars in this sample, with 97 CEMP Group I and 36 CEMP Group II stars identified in the A(C) versus [Fe/H] diagram. A subset of the confirmed low-metallicity stars were followed-up with high-resolution spectroscopy, as part of the R-process Alliance, with the goal of identifying new highly and moderately r-process-enhanced stars. Comparison between the stellar atmospheric parameters estimated in this work and from high-resolution spectroscopy exhibit good agreement, confirming our expectation that medium-resolution observing campaigns are an effective way of selecting interesting stars for further, more targeted, efforts. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | American Astronomical Society | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.3847/1538-4357/AAF3B9 | en_US |
dc.rights | Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. | en_US |
dc.source | The American Astronomical Society | en_US |
dc.title | The R-Process Alliance: Spectroscopic Follow-up of Low-metallicity Star Candidates from the Best & Brightest Survey | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Placco, Vinicius M. et al. “The R-Process Alliance: Spectroscopic Follow-up of Low-metallicity Star Candidates from the Best & Brightest Survey.” Astrophysical Journal, 870, 2 (January 2019): 122 © 2019 The Author(s) | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Astrophysical Journal | en_US |
dc.eprint.version | Final published version | en_US |
dc.type.uri | http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle | en_US |
eprint.status | http://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerReviewed | en_US |
dc.date.updated | 2020-10-23T14:04:23Z | |
dspace.orderedauthors | Placco, VM; Santucci, RM; Beers, TC; Chanamé, J; Sepúlveda, MP; Coronado, J; Rossi, S; Lee, YS; Starkenburg, E; Youakim, K; Barrientos, M; Ezzeddine, R; Frebel, A; Hansen, TT; Holmbeck, EM; Ji, AP; Rasmussen, KC; Roederer, IU; Sakari, CM; Whitten, DD | en_US |
dspace.date.submission | 2020-10-23T14:04:34Z | |
mit.journal.volume | 870 | en_US |
mit.journal.issue | 2 | en_US |
mit.license | PUBLISHER_POLICY | |
mit.metadata.status | Complete | |