dc.contributor.author | Orii, Lisa | |
dc.contributor.author | Alonso-Pastor, Luis | |
dc.contributor.author | Larson, Kent | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-11-30T22:58:25Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-11-30T22:58:25Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-11 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2020-10 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2071-1050 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/128701 | |
dc.description.abstract | The MIT Media Lab City Science Group reshapes and reevaluates well-being as an emerging key indicator due the social challenges that cities are facing, such as inequality, police violence, and breaches to safety and security. Well-being in urban environments has been studied extensively, yet most research focuses on one aspect of well-being rather than multiple dimensions of well-being. Existing well-being indices that are used to compare well-being between different countries or to set a standards for well-being consider a variety of aspects that affect well-being, yet they are not specific to urban environments. When considering that no holistic and comprehensive research has been specifically conducted on well-being in urban environments, we research the relationship between the built features of an urban environment and well-being. In this paper, we propose a Well-Being Index composed of five urban indicators—Community Connectedness, Safety & Security, Physical Health, Mental Health, and Diversity—which are each described by a set of urban attributes that enhance well-being. Each attribute is quantified using a calculation formula. In addition to quantifying well-being, the Well-Being Index emphasizes specific urban features that urban planners should consider for future decision-making. We apply the Well-Being Index to predict well-being in Boston, Massachusetts, and Kansas City, Missouri, and we speculate that Boston has higher levels of well-being in terms of the city’s urban features. Based on our results, we provide suggestions for future choices in urban planning and design to improve the areas of well-being that we were able to identify with the Well-Being Index. We emphasize that the Well-Being Index can be applied to any city in the world, and can inform future decision-making for building urban environments through the CityScope platform; a novel methodology of interaction and collaboration by using a data-driven platform that simulates the impacts of interventions on urban ecosystems prior to detail-design and execution. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12229458 | en_US |
dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_US |
dc.source | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute | en_US |
dc.title | Methodology for Establishing Well-Being Urban Indicators at the District Level to be Used on the CityScope Platform | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Orii, Lisa et al. "Methodology for Establishing Well-Being Urban Indicators at the District Level to be Used on the CityScope Platform." Sustainability 12, 22 (November 2020): 9458 © 2020 The Authors | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Media Laboratory | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Sustainability | en_US |
dc.eprint.version | Final published version | en_US |
dc.type.uri | http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle | en_US |
eprint.status | http://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerReviewed | en_US |
dc.date.updated | 2020-11-26T14:08:47Z | |
dspace.date.submission | 2020-11-26T14:08:47Z | |
mit.journal.volume | 12 | en_US |
mit.journal.issue | 22 | en_US |
mit.license | PUBLISHER_CC | |
mit.metadata.status | Complete | |