Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStewart III, Charles H
dc.contributor.authorAlvarez, R. Michael
dc.contributor.authorPettigrew, Stephen S.
dc.contributor.authorWimpy, Cameron
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-07T20:22:16Z
dc.date.available2020-12-07T20:22:16Z
dc.date.issued2020-03
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/128739
dc.description.abstractObjective: We analyze the significant increase in the residual vote rate in the 2016 presidential election. The residual vote rate, which is the percentage of ballots cast in a presidential election that contain no vote for president, rose nationwide from 0.99 to 1.41 percent between 2012 and 2016. Method: We use election return data and public opinion data to examine why the residual vote rate increased in 2016. Results: The primary explanation for this rise is an increase in abstentions, which we argue results primarily from disaffected Republican voters rather than alienated Democratic voters. In addition, other factors related to election administration and electoral competition explain variation in the residual vote rates across states, particularly the use of mail/absentee ballots and the lack of competition at the top of the ticket in nonbattleground states. However, we note that the rise in the residual vote rate was not due to changes in voting technologies. Conclusion: Our research has implications for the use of the residual vote as a metric for studying election administration and voting technologies.en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/SSQU.12757en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceSSRNen_US
dc.titleAbstention, Protest, and Residual Votes in the 2016 Electionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationStewart III, Charles et al. "Abstention, Protest, and Residual Votes in the 2016 Election." Social Science Quarterly 101, 2 (March 2020): 925-939 © 2019 by the Southwestern Social Science Associationen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Political Scienceen_US
dc.relation.journalSocial Science Quarterlyen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2020-06-15T14:34:57Z
dspace.date.submission2020-06-15T14:35:00Z
mit.journal.volume101en_US
mit.journal.issue2en_US
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICY
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record