Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorThomas, Navya
dc.contributor.authorSwaminathan, Jaichander
dc.contributor.authorZaragoza, Guillermo
dc.contributor.authorAbu Al-Rub, Rashid K.
dc.contributor.authorLienhard, John H
dc.contributor.authorArafat, Hassan A.
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-02T19:03:15Z
dc.date.available2021-02-02T19:03:15Z
dc.date.issued2021-01
dc.date.submitted2020-12
dc.identifier.issn0011-9164
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/129639
dc.description.abstractIn this study, process enhancements achieved by the use of 3D printed feed spacers based on triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMS) were comparatively assessed using the two most common membrane distillation (MD) configurations: air gap (AGMD) and direct contact (DCMD). The MD performance was assessed based on the impact of spacer design (TPMS vs. commercial spacer) on flux and feed channel pressure drop, and their consequent impact on the levelized cost of water (COW). The studied spacer architectures led to a minimal improvement (≤17%) in AGMD flux, much lower than that achieved in DCMD (≤57%). Consequently, for a waste heat-operated MD process, the spacer-induced channel pressure drop became the most influential cost bottleneck on COW. Generally, the contribution of the pumping cost to the total operating cost was found to be greater for DCMD than AGMD. Thus, the COW of a waste heat operated DCMD is more sensitive to a decrease in spacer-induced channel pressure drop than in an AGMD. For an MD process operated with additional heat cost, the flux improvement achieved using TPMS spacers reduces the thermal energy component of the operating cost. Ultimately, this predominantly contributes to a lower COW.en_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2021.114940en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceProf. Lienharden_US
dc.titleComparative assessment of the effects of 3D printed feed spacers on process performance in MD systemsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationThomas, Navya et al. “Comparative assessment of the effect of 3D printed feed spacer geometries on process performance in membrane distillation systems.” Desalination 503 (May 2021): 114940 © 2021 Elsevier B.V.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentRohsenow Kendall Heat Transfer Laboratory (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.relation.journalDesalinationen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.date.submission2021-01-27T16:47:07Z
mit.journal.volume503en_US
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICY


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record