Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDion, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorArias, Franchesca
dc.contributor.authorAmini, Shawna
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Randall
dc.contributor.authorPenney, Dana
dc.contributor.authorLibon, David J.
dc.contributor.authorPrice, Catherine C.
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-18T15:50:42Z
dc.date.available2021-02-18T15:50:42Z
dc.date.issued2020-05
dc.identifier.issn1387-2877
dc.identifier.issn1875-8908
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/129815
dc.description.abstractBackground: A digital version of the clock drawing test (dCDT) provides new latency and graphomotor behavioral measurements. These variables have yet to be validated with external neuropsychological domains in non-demented adults. Objective: The current investigation reports on cognitive constructs associated with selected dCDT latency and graphomotor variables and compares performances between individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and non-MCI peers. Methods: 202 non-demented older adults (age 68.79 ± 6.18, 46% female, education years 16.02 ± 2.70) completed the dCDT and a comprehensive neuropsychological protocol. dCDT variables of interest included: total completion time (TCT), pre-first hand latency (PFHL), post-clock face latency (PCFL), and clock face area (CFA). We also explored variables of percent time drawing (i.e., 'ink time') versus percent time not drawing (i.e., 'think time'). Neuropsychological domains of interest included processing speed, working memory, language, and declarative memory. Results: Adjusting for age and premorbid cognitive reserve metrics, command TCT positively correlated with multiple cognitive domains; PFHL and PCFL negatively associated with worse performance on working memory and processing speed tests. For Copy, TCT, PCFL, and PFHL negatively correlated with processing speed, and CFA negatively correlated with language. Between-group analyses show MCI participants generated slower command TCT, produced smaller CFA, and required more command 'think' (% Think) than 'ink' (% Ink) time. Conclusion: Command dCDT variables of interest were primarily processing speed and working memory dependent. MCI participants showed dCDT differences relative to non-MCI peers, suggesting the dCDT may assist with classification. Results document cognitive construct validation to digital metrics of clock drawing.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation (Grant 1404333)en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherIOS Pressen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3233/jad-191089en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.titleCognitive Correlates of Digital Clock Drawing Metrics in Older Adults with and without Mild Cognitive Impairmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationDion, Catherine et al. "Cognitive Correlates of Digital Clock Drawing Metrics in Older Adults with and without Mild Cognitive Impairment." Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 75, 1 (May 2020): 73-83. © 2020 IOS Press and the authorsen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratoryen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Alzheimer's Diseaseen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2020-12-07T18:13:15Z
dspace.orderedauthorsDion, C; Arias, F; Amini, S; Davis, R; Penney, D; Libon, DJ; Price, CCen_US
dspace.date.submission2020-12-07T18:13:18Z
mit.journal.volume75en_US
mit.journal.issue1en_US
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICY
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record