Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLevi, Riccardo
dc.contributor.authorCarli, Francesco
dc.contributor.authorArévalo, Aldo Robles
dc.contributor.authorAltinel, Yuksel
dc.contributor.authorStein, Daniel J
dc.contributor.authorNaldini, Matteo Maria
dc.contributor.authorGrassi, Federica
dc.contributor.authorZanoni, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorFinkelstein, Stan Neil
dc.contributor.authorVieira, Susana M
dc.contributor.authorSousa, João
dc.contributor.authorCeli, Leo Anthony G.
dc.contributor.authorBarbieri, Riccardo
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-09T22:11:39Z
dc.date.available2021-03-09T22:11:39Z
dc.date.issued2021-01
dc.date.submitted2020-10
dc.date.submitted2020-10
dc.identifier.issn2632-1009
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/130113
dc.description.abstractObjective Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding commonly requires intensive care unit (ICU) in cases of potentialhaemodynamiccompromise or likely urgent intervention. However, manypatientsadmitted to the ICU stop bleeding and do not require further intervention, including blood transfusion. The present work proposes an artificial intelligence (AI) solution for the prediction of rebleeding in patients with GI bleeding admitted to ICU. Methods A machine learning algorithm was trained and tested using two publicly available ICU databases, the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care V.1.4 database and eICU Collaborative Research Database using freedom from transfusion as a proxy for patients who potentially did not require ICU-level care. Multiple initial observation time frames were explored using readily available data including labs, demographics and clinical parameters for a total of 20 covariates. Results The optimal model used a 5-hour observation period to achieve an area under the curve of the receiving operating curve (ROC-AUC) of greater than 0.80. The model was robust when tested against both ICU databases with a similar ROC-AUC for all. Conclusions The potential disruptive impact of AI in healthcare innovation is acknowledge, but awareness of AI-related risk on healthcare applications and current limitations should be considered before implementation and deployment. The proposed algorithm is not meant to replace but to inform clinical decision making. Prospective clinical trial validation as a triage tool is warranted.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation (Grant NIBIB R01 EB017205)en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBMJ Pubilshing Groupen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100245en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceBMJ Health & Care Informaticsen_US
dc.titleArtificial intelligence-based prediction of transfusion in the intensive care unit in patients with gastrointestinal bleedingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationLevi, Riccardo et al. “Artificial intelligence-based prediction of transfusion in the intensive care unit in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding.” BMJ Health and Care Informatics 28, 1 (January 2021): e100245 © 2021 The Author(s)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Data, Systems, and Societyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Medical Engineering & Scienceen_US
dc.relation.journalBMJ Health and Care Informaticsen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2021-02-04T18:14:03Z
dspace.orderedauthorsLevi, R; Carli, F; Arévalo, AR; Altinel, Y; Stein, DJ; Naldini, MM; Grassi, F; Zanoni, A; Finkelstein, S; Vieira, SM; Sousa, J; Barbieri, R; Celi, LAen_US
dspace.date.submission2021-02-04T18:14:10Z
mit.journal.volume28en_US
mit.journal.issue1en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record