Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYu, Xi
dc.contributor.authorZuk, Jennifer
dc.contributor.authorPerdue, Meaghan V.
dc.contributor.authorOzernov-Palchik, Ola
dc.contributor.authorRaney, Talia
dc.contributor.authorBeach, Sara Dawley
dc.contributor.authorNorton, Elizabeth S.
dc.contributor.authorOu, Yangming
dc.contributor.authorGabrieli, John D. E.
dc.contributor.authorGaab, Nadine
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-29T14:31:03Z
dc.date.available2021-04-09T20:17:18Z
dc.date.available2022-03-29T14:31:03Z
dc.date.issued2020-03
dc.date.submitted2020-01
dc.identifier.issn1065-9471
dc.identifier.issn1097-0193
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/130434.2
dc.description.abstractHuman Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Developmental dyslexia affects 40–60% of children with a familial risk (FHD+) compared to a general prevalence of 5–10%. Despite the increased risk, about half of FHD+ children develop typical reading abilities (FHD+Typical). Yet the underlying neural characteristics of favorable reading outcomes in at-risk children remain unknown. Utilizing a retrospective, longitudinal approach, this study examined whether putative protective neural mechanisms can be observed in FHD+Typical at the prereading stage. Functional and structural brain characteristics were examined in 47 FHD+ prereaders who subsequently developed typical (n = 35) or impaired (n = 12) reading abilities and 34 controls (FHD−Typical). Searchlight-based multivariate pattern analyses identified distinct activation patterns during phonological processing between FHD+Typical and FHD−Typical in right inferior frontal gyrus (RIFG) and left temporo-parietal cortex (LTPC) regions. Follow-up analyses on group-specific classification patterns demonstrated LTPC hypoactivation in FHD+Typical compared to FHD−Typical, suggesting this neural characteristic as an FHD+ phenotype. In contrast, RIFG showed hyperactivation in FHD+Typical than FHD−Typical, and its activation pattern was positively correlated with subsequent reading abilities in FHD+ but not controls (FHD−Typical). RIFG hyperactivation in FHD+Typical was further associated with increased interhemispheric functional and structural connectivity. These results suggest that some protective neural mechanisms are already established in FHD+Typical prereaders supporting their typical reading development.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute of Child Health and Human Development (Awards R01HD067312 and R01HD65762‐01)en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24980en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceWileyen_US
dc.titlePutative protective neural mechanisms in prereaders with a family history of dyslexia who subsequently develop typical reading skillsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationYu, Xi et al. "Putative protective neural mechanisms in prereaders with a family history of dyslexia who subsequently develop typical reading skills." Human Brain Mapping 41, 10 (March 2020): 2827-2845 © 2020 The Authorsen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMcGovern Institute for Brain Research at MITen_US
dc.relation.journalHuman Brain Mappingen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2021-03-19T14:40:40Z
dspace.orderedauthorsYu, X; Zuk, J; Perdue, MV; Ozernov‐Palchik, O; Raney, T; Beach, SD; Norton, ES; Ou, Y; Gabrieli, JDE; Gaab, Nen_US
dspace.date.submission2021-03-19T14:40:41Z
mit.journal.volume41en_US
mit.journal.issue10en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

VersionItemDateSummary

*Selected version