Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPinotsis, Dimitrios
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Earl K
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-29T12:25:01Z
dc.date.available2021-04-29T12:25:01Z
dc.date.issued2019-11
dc.identifier.issn1053-8119
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/130546
dc.description.abstractMany recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) are rooted in visual neuroscience. However, ideas from more complicated paradigms like decision-making are less used. Although automated decision-making systems are ubiquitous (driverless cars, pilot support systems, medical diagnosis algorithms etc.), achieving human-level performance in decision making tasks is still a challenge. At the same time, these tasks that are hard for AI are easy for humans. Thus, understanding human brain dynamics during these decision-making tasks and modeling them using deep neural networks could improve AI performance. Here we modelled some of the complex neural interactions during a sensorimotor decision making task. We investigated how brain dynamics flexibly represented and distinguished between sensory processing and categorization in two sensory domains: motion direction and color. We used two different approaches for understanding neural representations. We compared brain responses to 1) the geometry of a sensory or category domain (domain selectivity) and 2) predictions from deep neural networks (computation selectivity). Both approaches gave us similar results. This confirmed the validity of our analyses. Using the first approach, we found that neural representations changed depending on context. We then trained deep recurrent neural networks to perform the same tasks as the animals. Using the second approach, we found that computations in different brain areas also changed flexibly depending on context. Color computations appeared to rely more on sensory processing, while motion computations more on abstract categories. Overall, our results shed light to the biological basis of categorization and differences in selectivity and computations in different brain areas. They also suggest a way for studying sensory and categorical representations in the brain: compare brain responses to both a behavioral model and a deep neural network and test if they give similar results.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute of Mental Health (U.S.) (Grant R37MH087027)en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2019.116118en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.titleSensory processing and categorization in cortical and deep neural networksen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationPinotsis, Dimitris A. et al. “Sensory processing and categorization in cortical and deep neural networks.” NeuroImage, 202 (November 2019): 116118 © 2019 The Author(s)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentPicower Institute for Learning and Memoryen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.journalNeuroImageen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2021-04-15T18:47:36Z
dspace.orderedauthorsPinotsis, DA; Siegel, M; Miller, EKen_US
dspace.date.submission2021-04-15T18:47:37Z
mit.journal.volume202en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record