Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMateen, Farrah J
dc.contributor.authorVogel, Andre C
dc.contributor.authorKaplan, Tamara B
dc.contributor.authorHotan, Gladia C
dc.contributor.authorGrundy, Sara J
dc.contributor.authorHolroyd, Kathryn B
dc.contributor.authorManalo, Natalie
dc.contributor.authorStauder, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorVidenovic, Aleksandar
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-20T17:16:59Z
dc.date.available2021-09-20T17:16:59Z
dc.date.issued2020-04-24
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/131420
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Bright white light therapy (LT) can improve fatigue in several disease states but has not been studied in multiple sclerosis (MS). Objective To determine whether controlled home-based LT is feasible, tolerable, and well-adhered to in MS-associated fatigue. Methods A randomized, controlled trial of twice-daily 1-h bright white LT (BWLT) (10,000 lx, active arm) versus dim red LT (DRLT) (< 300 lx, control arm) was performed. Adults with MS-associated fatigue were enrolled for 10 weeks: 2-week baseline, 4-week intervention, 4-week washout. Results 41 participants were enrolled; 35 were randomized (average age 42 years, 80% female; BWLT n = 20; DRLT n = 15). 31 were in the intention to treat analysis. The average duration of LT sessions was similar between groups (BWLT 60.9 min, DRLT 61.5 min, p = 0.70). The most commonly reported adverse event was headache. There were no events that led to discontinuation. Baseline fatigue was severe in both arms (each 53/63 points on the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), p = 0.92). FSS was lower following BWLT (FSS 45.8 post-LT, p = 0.04; 44.9 post-washout, p = 0.02 intra-group compared to baseline FSS) and DRLT (FSS 46.7 post-LT, p = 0.03; 43.9 post-washout, p = 0.002 intragroup compared to baseline FSS). There was no difference between BWLT and DRLT groups in the magnitude of reduction of FSS scores (p = 0.81 after LT; p = 0.77 after washout for between group comparisons). Similarly, MS quality of life metrics improved in both arms but were not significantly different between groups after LT (p = 0.22) or washout. Conclusions LT is safe, feasible, and well-tolerated in people with MS-associated fatigue. Improvement in both light spectra likely indicates a strong placebo effect for the DRLT group.en_US
dc.publisherSpringer Berlin Heidelbergen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-09845-wen_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceSpringer Berlin Heidelbergen_US
dc.titleLight therapy for multiple sclerosis-associated fatigue: a randomized, controlled phase II trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2020-09-24T20:57:12Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderSpringer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
dspace.embargo.termsY
dspace.date.submission2020-09-24T20:57:12Z
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICY
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Needed


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record