Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSnyder, Jessica M.
dc.contributor.authorSnider, Timothy A.
dc.contributor.authorCiol, Marcia A.
dc.contributor.authorWilkinson, John E.
dc.contributor.authorImai, Denise M.
dc.contributor.authorCasey, Kerriann M.
dc.contributor.authorVilches-Moure, Jose G.
dc.contributor.authorPettan-Brewer, Christina
dc.contributor.authorPillai, Smitha P. S.
dc.contributor.authorCarrasco, Sebastian E.
dc.contributor.authorSalimi, Shabnam
dc.contributor.authorLadiges, Warren
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-14T17:52:18Z
dc.date.available2021-09-20T17:17:08Z
dc.date.available2022-03-14T17:52:18Z
dc.date.issued2019-08
dc.date.submitted2019-04
dc.identifier.issn2509-2715
dc.identifier.issn2509-2723
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/131451.2
dc.description.abstractAbstract An understanding of early-onset mechanisms underlying age-related changes can be obtained by evaluating changes that precede frailty and end of life using histological characterization of age-related lesions. Histopathology-based information as a component of aging studies in mice can complement and add context to molecular, cellular, and physiologic data, but there is a lack of information regarding scoring criteria and lesion grading guidelines. This report describes the validation of a grading system, designated as the geropathology grading platform (GGP), which generated a composite lesion score (CLS) for comparison of histological lesion scores in tissues from aging mice. To assess reproducibility of the scoring system, multiple veterinary pathologists independently scored the same slides from the heart, lung, liver, and kidney from two different strains (C57BL/6 and CB6F1) of male mice at 8, 16, 24, and 32 months of age. There was moderate to high agreement between pathologists, particularly when agreement within a 1-point range was considered. CLS for all organs was significantly higher in older versus younger mice, suggesting that the GGP was reliable for detecting age-related pathology in mice. The overall results suggest that the GGP guidelines reliably distinguish between younger and older mice and may therefore be accurate in distinguishing between experimental groups of mice with more, or less, age-related pathology.en_US
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLCen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-019-00088-wen_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceSpringer International Publishingen_US
dc.titleValidation of a geropathology grading system for aging mouse studiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Division of Comparative Medicine
dc.relation.journalGeroScienceen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2020-09-24T21:15:05Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderAmerican Aging Association
dspace.embargo.termsY
dspace.date.submission2020-09-24T21:15:05Z
mit.journal.volume41en_US
mit.journal.issue4en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICY
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

VersionItemDateSummary

*Selected version