Notice

This is not the latest version of this item. The latest version can be found at:https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/131801.2

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorColombo, E. F
dc.contributor.authorShougarian, N.
dc.contributor.authorSinha, K.
dc.contributor.authorCascini, G.
dc.contributor.authorde Weck, O. L
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-20T17:30:19Z
dc.date.available2021-09-20T17:30:19Z
dc.date.issued2019-11-28
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/131801
dc.description.abstractAbstract Mass customization and product platform design can exploit the benefits of modularity and provide personalized devices at competitive costs through economies of scope. However, customization-intense platforms can have thousands of potential configurations, whose development and verification must be prioritized. This paper develops a value analysis methodology that is able to rank alternative platform configurations according to customers’ preferences. It introduces Logit value, a definition of value based on a well-known stated choice model and explains the five steps of platform-based value analysis. Since product platforms are complex technical systems, particular attention is given to the gathering of information, the automatic generation of platform architectures and the visualization of results. A case study based on Google ARA’s Spiral-2 modular smart phone concept demonstrates an application of the methodology and shows its potential benefits. The case study leverages data from a conjoint analysis and survey of 200 potential customers in Puerto Rico and a generated set of over 21,000 potential configurations of which less than 1% are shown to be non-dominated. The value analysis identifies module types that are compatible with the modular product platform and appear in a high percentage of Pareto architectures. Knowledge pertaining to non-dominated configurations can provide insights into module development strategy and verification/validation activities.en_US
dc.publisherSpringer Londonen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-019-00326-4en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceSpringer Londonen_US
dc.titleValue analysis for customizable modular product platforms: theory and case studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2020-09-24T20:41:56Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderSpringer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature
dspace.embargo.termsY
dspace.date.submission2020-09-24T20:41:56Z
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICY
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Needed


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

VersionItemDateSummary

*Selected version