Notice
This is not the latest version of this item. The latest version can be found at:https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/131801.2
Value analysis for customizable modular product platforms: theory and case study
| dc.contributor.author | Colombo, E. F | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shougarian, N. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sinha, K. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cascini, G. | |
| dc.contributor.author | de Weck, O. L | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-20T17:30:19Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-09-20T17:30:19Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019-11-28 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/131801 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract Mass customization and product platform design can exploit the benefits of modularity and provide personalized devices at competitive costs through economies of scope. However, customization-intense platforms can have thousands of potential configurations, whose development and verification must be prioritized. This paper develops a value analysis methodology that is able to rank alternative platform configurations according to customers’ preferences. It introduces Logit value, a definition of value based on a well-known stated choice model and explains the five steps of platform-based value analysis. Since product platforms are complex technical systems, particular attention is given to the gathering of information, the automatic generation of platform architectures and the visualization of results. A case study based on Google ARA’s Spiral-2 modular smart phone concept demonstrates an application of the methodology and shows its potential benefits. The case study leverages data from a conjoint analysis and survey of 200 potential customers in Puerto Rico and a generated set of over 21,000 potential configurations of which less than 1% are shown to be non-dominated. The value analysis identifies module types that are compatible with the modular product platform and appear in a high percentage of Pareto architectures. Knowledge pertaining to non-dominated configurations can provide insights into module development strategy and verification/validation activities. | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Springer London | en_US |
| dc.relation.isversionof | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-019-00326-4 | en_US |
| dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike | en_US |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | en_US |
| dc.source | Springer London | en_US |
| dc.title | Value analysis for customizable modular product platforms: theory and case study | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dc.eprint.version | Author's final manuscript | en_US |
| dc.type.uri | http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle | en_US |
| eprint.status | http://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerReviewed | en_US |
| dc.date.updated | 2020-09-24T20:41:56Z | |
| dc.language.rfc3066 | en | |
| dc.rights.holder | Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature | |
| dspace.embargo.terms | Y | |
| dspace.date.submission | 2020-09-24T20:41:56Z | |
| mit.license | OPEN_ACCESS_POLICY | |
| mit.metadata.status | Authority Work and Publication Information Needed |
