Notice

This is not the latest version of this item. The latest version can be found at:https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/132499.2

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAkers, C
dc.contributor.authorEngelhardt, N
dc.contributor.authorHarlow, D
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-20T18:22:44Z
dc.date.available2021-09-20T18:22:44Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/132499
dc.description.abstract© 2020, The Author(s). Several recent papers have shown a close relationship between entanglement wedge reconstruction and the unitarity of black hole evaporation in AdS/CFT. The analysis of these papers however has a rather puzzling feature: all calculations are done using bulk dynamics which are essentially those Hawking used to predict information loss, but applying ideas from entanglement wedge reconstruction seems to suggest a Page curve which is consistent with information conservation. Why should two different calculations in the same model give different answers for the Page curve? In this note we present a new pair of models which clarify this situation. Our first model gives a holographic illustration of unitary black hole evaporation, in which the analogue of the Hawking radiation purifies itself as expected, and this purification is reproduced by the entanglement wedge analysis. Moreover a smooth black hole interior persists until the last stages the evaporation process. Our second model gives an alternative holographic interpretation of the situation where the bulk evolution leads to information loss: unlike in the models proposed so far, this bulk information loss is correctly reproduced by the entanglement wedge analysis. This serves as an illustration that quantum extremal surfaces are in some sense kinematic: the time-dependence of the entropy they compute depends on the choice of bulk dynamics. In both models no bulk quantum corrections need to be considered: classical extremal surfaces are enough to do the job. We argue that our first model is the one which gives the right analogy for what actually happens to evaporating black holes, but we also emphasize that any complete resolution of the information problem will require an understanding of non-perturbative bulk dynamics.en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLCen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/JHEP08(2020)032en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceSpringeren_US
dc.titleSimple holographic models of black hole evaporationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of High Energy Physicsen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2020-10-20T17:16:54Z
dspace.orderedauthorsAkers, C; Engelhardt, N; Harlow, Den_US
dspace.date.submission2020-10-20T17:16:57Z
mit.journal.volume2020en_US
mit.journal.issue8en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Needed


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

VersionItemDateSummary

*Selected version