Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTorrey, Paul A.
dc.contributor.authorVogelsberger, Mark
dc.contributor.authorHernquist, Lars
dc.contributor.authorMcKinnon, Ryan Michael
dc.contributor.authorMarinacci, Federico
dc.contributor.authorSimcoe, Robert A
dc.contributor.authorSpringel, Volker
dc.contributor.authorPillepich, Annalisa
dc.contributor.authorNaiman, Jill
dc.contributor.authorPakmor, Rüdiger
dc.contributor.authorWeinberger, Rainer
dc.contributor.authorNelson, Dylan
dc.contributor.authorGenel, Shy
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-01T18:24:18Z
dc.date.available2021-10-01T18:24:18Z
dc.date.issued2018-03-03
dc.identifier.issn1745-3925
dc.identifier.issn1745-3933
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/132685
dc.description.abstractThe fundamental metallicity relation (FMR) is a postulated correlation between galaxy stellar mass, star formation rate (SFR), and gas-phase metallicity. At its core, this relation posits that offsets from the mass-metallicity relation (MZR) at a fixed stellar mass are correlated with galactic SFR. In this Letter, we use hydrodynamical simulations to quantify the time-scales over which populations of galaxies oscillate about the average SFR and metallicity values at fixed stellarmass.We find that Illustris and IllustrisTNG predict that galaxy offsets from the star formation main sequence and MZR oscillate over similar time-scales, are often anticorrelated in their evolution, evolve with the halo dynamical time, and produce a pronounced FMR. Our models indicate that galaxies oscillate about equilibrium SFR and metallicity values - set by the galaxy's stellar mass - and that SFR and metallicity offsets evolve in an anticorrelated fashion. This anticorrelated variability of the metallicity and SFR offsets drives the existence of the FMR in our models. In contrast to Illustris and IllustrisTNG, we speculate that the SFR and metallicity evolution tracks may become decoupled in galaxy formation models dominated by feedback-driven globally bursty SFR histories, which could weaken the FMR residual correlation strength. This opens the possibility of discriminating between bursty and non-bursty feedback models based on the strength and persistence of the FMR - especially at high redshift.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (HST-HF2-51341.001-A)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. Department of Energy. Computational Science Graduate Fellowship Program (Grant DEFG02-97ER25308)en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherOxford University Press (OUP)en_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1093/mnrasl/sly031en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourcearXiven_US
dc.titleSimilar star formation rate and metallicity variability time-scales drive the fundamental metallicity relationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationTorrey, Paul, et al. “Similar Star Formation Rate and Metallicity Variability Time-Scales Drive the Fundamental Metallicity Relation.” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 477, no. 1 (June 2018): L16–20. © 2018 The Authorsen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Researchen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physicsen_US
dc.relation.journalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Societyen_US
dc.eprint.versionOriginal manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/NonPeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2019-06-10T11:37:31Z
dspace.date.submission2019-06-10T11:37:31Z
mit.metadata.statusCompleteen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record