Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDavis, Shakti K.
dc.contributor.authorMilechin, Lauren
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Tejash
dc.contributor.authorHernandez, Mark
dc.contributor.authorCiccarelli, Gregory A.
dc.contributor.authorSamsi, Siddharth
dc.contributor.authorHensley, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorGoff, Arthur
dc.contributor.authorTrefry, John
dc.contributor.authorJohnston, Sara
dc.contributor.authorPurcell, Bret
dc.contributor.authorCabrera, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorFleischman, Jack
dc.contributor.authorReuther, Albert I.
dc.contributor.authorRossi, Franco
dc.contributor.authorHonko, Anna
dc.contributor.authorPratt, William
dc.contributor.authorSwiston, Albert Joseph
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-08T18:34:18Z
dc.date.available2021-10-08T18:34:18Z
dc.date.issued2021-09
dc.date.submitted2021-04
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/132914
dc.description.abstractEarly pathogen exposure detection allows better patient care and faster implementation of public health measures (patient isolation, contact tracing). Existing exposure detection most frequently relies on overt clinical symptoms, namely fever, during the infectious prodromal period. We have developed a robust machine learning based method to better detect asymptomatic states during the incubation period using subtle, sub-clinical physiological markers. Starting with high-resolution physiological waveform data from non-human primate studies of viral (Ebola, Marburg, Lassa, and Nipah viruses) and bacterial Y. pestis exposure, we processed the data to reduce short-term variability and normalize diurnal variations, then provided these to a supervised random forest classification algorithm and post-classifier declaration logic step to reduce false alarms. In most subjects detection is achieved well before the onset of fever; subject cross-validation across exposure studies (varying viruses, exposure routes, animal species, and target dose) lead to 51h mean early detection (at 0.93 area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve [AUCROC]). Evaluating the algorithm against entirely independent datasets for Lassa, Nipah, and Y. pestis exposures un-used in algorithm training and development yields a mean 51h early warning time (at AUCROC=0.95). We discuss which physiological indicators are most informative for early detection and options for extending this capability to limited datasets such as those available from wearable, non-invasive, ECG-based sensors.en_US
dc.publisherCold Spring Harbor Laboratoryen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.691074en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceFrontiersen_US
dc.titleDetecting pathogen exposure during the non-symptomatic incubation period using physiological dataen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationDavis, Shakti et al. "Detecting pathogen exposure during the non-symptomatic incubation period using physiological data." Frontiers in Physiology 12 (September 2021): 691074. © 2021 Davis et al.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentLincoln Laboratoryen_US
dc.relation.journalFrontiers in Physiologyen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.date.submission2021-09-09T16:49:22Z
mit.journal.volume12en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusCompleteen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record