Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSevtsuk, Andres
dc.contributor.authorBasu, Rounaq
dc.contributor.authorChancey, Bahij
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-12T18:18:04Z
dc.date.available2021-10-12T18:18:04Z
dc.date.issued2021-08
dc.date.submitted2020-11
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/132932
dc.description.abstractCities are increasingly promoting walkability to tackle climate change, improve urban quality of life, and address socioeconomic inequities that auto-oriented development tends to exacerbate, prompting a need for predictive pedestrian flow models. This paper implements a novel network-based pedestrian flow model at a property-level resolution in the City of Melbourne. Data on Melbourne’s urban form, land-uses, amenities, and pedestrian walkways as well as weather conditions are used to predict pedestrian flows between different land-use pairs, which are subsequently calibrated against hourly observed pedestrian counts from automated sensors. Calibration allows the model extrapolate pedestrian flows on all streets throughout the city center based on reliable baseline observations, and to forecast how new development projects will change existing pedestrian flows. Longitudinal data availability also allows us to validate how accurate such predictions are by comparing model results to actual pedestrian counts observed in following years. Updating the built-environment data annually, we (1) test the accuracy of different calibration techniques for predicting foot-traffic on the city’s streets in subsequent years; (2) assess how changes in the built environment affect changes in foot-traffic; (3) analyze which pedestrian origin-destination flows explain observed foot-traffic during three peak weekday periods; and (4) assess the stability of model predictions over time. We find that annual changes in the built environment have a significant and measurable impact on the spatial distribution of Melbourne’s pedestrian flows. We hope this novel framework can be used by planners to implement “pedestrian impact assessments” for newly planned developments, which can complement traditional vehicular “traffic impact assessments”.en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)en_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1371/journal.pone.0257534en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourcePLoSen_US
dc.titleWe shape our buildings, but do they then shape us? A longitudinal analysis of pedestrian flows and development activity in Melbourneen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationSevtsuk A, Basu R, Chancey B (2021) We shape our buildings, but do they then shape us? A longitudinal analysis of pedestrian flows and development activity in Melbourne. PLoS ONE 16(9): e0257534en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning
dc.relation.journalPLOS ONEen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2021-10-12T12:29:39Z
dspace.orderedauthorsSevtsuk, A; Basu, R; Chancey, Ben_US
dspace.date.submission2021-10-12T12:29:43Z
mit.journal.volume16en_US
mit.journal.issue9en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record