Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSay, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorManning, Alistair J
dc.contributor.authorWestern, Luke M
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Dickon
dc.contributor.authorWisher, Adam
dc.contributor.authorRigby, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorReimann, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorVollmer, Martin K
dc.contributor.authorMaione, Michela
dc.contributor.authorArduini, Jgor
dc.contributor.authorKrummel, Paul B
dc.contributor.authorMühle, Jens
dc.contributor.authorHarth, Christina M
dc.contributor.authorEvans, Brendan
dc.contributor.authorWeiss, Ray F
dc.contributor.authorPrinn, Ronald G
dc.contributor.authorO'Doherty, Simon
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-21T15:09:21Z
dc.date.available2021-10-21T15:09:21Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/133074
dc.description.abstractPerfluorocarbons (PFCs) are amongst the most potent greenhouse gases listed under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). With atmospheric lifetimes on the order of thousands to tens of thousands of years, PFC emissions represent a permanent alteration to the global atmosphere on human timescales. While the industries responsible for the vast majority of these emissions-aluminium smelting and semi-conductor manufacturing-have made efficiency improvements and introduced abatement measures, the global mean mole fractions of three PFCs, namely tetrafluoromethane (CF4, PFC-14), hexafluoroethane (C2F6, PFC-116) and octafluoropropane (C3F8, PFC-218), continue to grow. In this study, we update baseline growth rates using in situ high-frequency measurements from the Advanced Global Atmospheric Gases Experiment (AGAGE) and, using data from four European stations, estimate PFC emissions for northwest Europe. The global growth rate of CF4 decreased from 1.3 ppt yr-1 in 1979 to 0.6 ppt yr-1 around 2010 followed by a renewed steady increase to 0.9 ppt yr-1 in 2019. For C2F6, the growth rate grew to a maximum of 0.125 ppt yr-1 around 1999, followed by a decline to a minimum of 0.075 ppt yr-1 in 2009, followed by weak growth thereafter. The C3F8 growth rate was around 0.007 ppt yr-1 until the early 1990s and then quickly grew to a maximum of 0.03 ppt yr-1 in 2003-2004. Following a period of decline until 2012 to 0.015 ppt yr-1, the growth rate slowly increased again to ∼ 0.017 ppt yr-1 in 2019. We used an inverse modelling framework to infer PFC emissions for northwest Europe. No statistically significant trend in regional emissions was observed for any of the PFCs assessed. For CF4, European emissions in early years were linked predominantly to the aluminium industry. However, we link large emissions in recent years to a chemical manufacturer in northwest Italy. Emissions of C2F6 are linked to a range of sources, including a semi-conductor manufacturer in Ireland and a cluster of smelters in Germany's Ruhr valley. In contrast, northwest European emissions of C3F8 are dominated by a single source in northwest England, raising the possibility of using emissions from this site for a tracer release experiment.en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCopernicus GmbHen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.5194/ACP-21-2149-2021en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceCopernicus Publicationsen_US
dc.titleGlobal trends and European emissions of tetrafluoromethane (CF 4 ), hexafluoroethane (C 2 F 6 ) and octafluoropropane (C 3 F 8 )en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationSay, Daniel, Manning, Alistair J, Western, Luke M, Young, Dickon, Wisher, Adam et al. 2021. "Global trends and European emissions of tetrafluoromethane (CF 4 ), hexafluoroethane (C 2 F 6 ) and octafluoropropane (C 3 F 8 )." Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 21 (3).
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Global Change Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.journalAtmospheric Chemistry and Physicsen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2021-09-21T16:45:18Z
dspace.orderedauthorsSay, D; Manning, AJ; Western, LM; Young, D; Wisher, A; Rigby, M; Reimann, S; Vollmer, MK; Maione, M; Arduini, J; Krummel, PB; Mühle, J; Harth, CM; Evans, B; Weiss, RF; Prinn, RG; O'Doherty, Sen_US
dspace.date.submission2021-09-21T16:45:22Z
mit.journal.volume21en_US
mit.journal.issue3en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusPublication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record