Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHeimer, Rawley
dc.contributor.authorSimsek, Alp
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-27T19:58:29Z
dc.date.available2021-10-27T19:58:29Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/134174
dc.description.abstract© 2018 Does the provision of leverage to retail traders improve market quality or facilitate socially inefficient speculation that enriches financial intermediaries? We evaluate the effects of 2010 regulations that cap leverage in the U.S. retail foreign exchange market. Using three unique data sets and a difference-in-differences approach, we document that the leverage-constraint reduces trading volume by 23%, alleviates high-leverage traders’ losses by 40%, and reduces brokerages’ operating capital by 25%. Yet, the policy does not affect the relative bid-ask prices charged by the brokerages. These results suggest the policy improves belief-neutral social welfare without reducing market liquidity.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/J.JFINECO.2018.10.017
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceNBER
dc.titleShould retail investors’ leverage be limited?
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics
dc.relation.journalJournal of Financial Economics
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscript
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerReviewed
dc.date.updated2019-10-23T15:33:37Z
dspace.orderedauthorsHeimer, R; Simsek, A
dspace.date.submission2019-10-23T15:33:40Z
mit.journal.volume132
mit.journal.issue3
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Needed


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record