Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorIatridou, Sabine
dc.contributor.authorZeijlstra, Hedde
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-27T20:04:36Z
dc.date.available2021-10-27T20:04:36Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/134357
dc.description.abstract© 2019 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. In this article, we discuss two negative polarity item (NPI) adverbials: in years (and its cousins in days, in months, etc.) and until. We argue that much is to be gained by analyzing the two in juxtaposition. We first explore in years, following our approach in Iatridou and Zeijlstra 2017; on the basis of our analysis of this item, we then explore until. Our approach permits a unified account of until, whose behavior has led researchers to consider it lexically ambiguous. The commonalities between in years and our unified until also allow us to explain why both these boundary adverbials are strong as opposed to weak NPIs.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMIT Press - Journals
dc.relation.isversionof10.1162/LING_A_00368
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
dc.sourceMIT Press
dc.titleThe Complex Beauty of Boundary Adverbials: In Years and Until
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
dc.relation.journalLinguistic Inquiry
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerReviewed
dc.date.updated2021-03-25T13:38:27Z
dspace.orderedauthorsIatridou, S; Zeijlstra, H
dspace.date.submission2021-03-25T13:38:28Z
mit.journal.volume52
mit.journal.issue1
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICY
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Needed


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record