dc.contributor.author | Miklós-Thal, Jeanine | |
dc.contributor.author | Tucker, Catherine | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-10-27T20:04:51Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-10-27T20:04:51Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/134402 | |
dc.description.abstract | © 2019 INFORMS. We build a game-theoretic model to examine how better demand forecasting resulting from algorithms, machine learning, and artificial intelligence affects the sustainability of collusion in an industry. We find that, although better forecasting allows colluding firms to better tailor prices to demand conditions, it also increases each firm's temptation to deviate to a lower price in time periods of high predicted demand. Overall, our research suggests that, despite concerns expressed by policy makers, better forecasting and algorithms can lead to lower prices and higher consumer surplus. | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS) | |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1287/MNSC.2019.3287 | |
dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | |
dc.source | SSRN | |
dc.title | Collusion by Algorithm: Does Better Demand Prediction Facilitate Coordination Between Sellers? | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.contributor.department | Sloan School of Management | |
dc.relation.journal | Management Science | |
dc.eprint.version | Original manuscript | |
dc.type.uri | http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle | |
eprint.status | http://purl.org/eprint/status/NonPeerReviewed | |
dc.date.updated | 2021-04-09T14:56:18Z | |
dspace.orderedauthors | Miklós-Thal, J; Tucker, C | |
dspace.date.submission | 2021-04-09T14:56:19Z | |
mit.journal.volume | 65 | |
mit.journal.issue | 4 | |
mit.license | OPEN_ACCESS_POLICY | |
mit.metadata.status | Authority Work and Publication Information Needed | |