Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBakshi, A
dc.contributor.authorAltantzis, C
dc.contributor.authorGlicksman, LR
dc.contributor.authorGhoniem, AF
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-27T20:05:12Z
dc.date.available2021-10-27T20:05:12Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/134480
dc.description.abstract© 2017 Elsevier B.V. Gas-flow distribution plays a critical role in the performance of fluidized beds because it directly affects gas residence-time and solids mixing. However, measuring it accurately in the harsh conditions of larger reactors is not possible. Therefore, this study is focused on the development of a rigorous computational framework for quantifying gas-flow distribution during fluidization. To this end, fine-grid simulations are conducted for the bubbling fluidization of two distinct Geldart B particles - 1.15 mm LLDPE and 0.50 mm glass particles, at superficial gas velocities U/Umf = 2 and 3 in a 50 cm diameter bed. The two-fluid model (TFM) is employed to describe the solids motion efficiently and in-house developed tool MS3DATA (Multiphase-flow Statistics using 3D Detection and Tracking Algorithm) to compute detailed bubble statistics. The overall gas flow is divided into three phases: (a) dense flow in areas relatively rich is solids concentration (b) “visible” bubble flow associated with rising bubbles and (c) throughflow accounting for the gas flow which mostly bypasses through bubbles. It is found that conditions within the dense-phase depend largely on the particle properties while bubbling dynamics are significantly affected by superficial gas velocity. Calculations show that the throughflow increases in areas frequented by bubbles because the voidage distribution around bubbles increases the local dense-phase permeability. Throughflow may account for up to 40% of the overall gas flow, especially in the fluidization of large particles. This is not desirable because its residence-time is almost 2 × shorter (as compared to the dense flow) and contributes minimally to solids mixing. Finally, it is shown that in comparison to lab-scales, larger beds exhibit more homogeneous gas mixing. Insights from this study and the methodology developed will be useful in investigating gas flow distribution in complex fuel conversion systems.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/J.POWTEC.2017.01.005
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceOther repository
dc.titleGas-flow distribution in bubbling fluidized beds: CFD-based analysis and impact of operating conditions
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
dc.relation.journalPowder Technology
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscript
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerReviewed
dc.date.updated2019-09-26T14:27:17Z
dspace.orderedauthorsBakshi, A; Altantzis, C; Glicksman, LR; Ghoniem, AF
dspace.date.submission2019-09-26T14:27:20Z
mit.journal.volume316
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Needed


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record