Notice
This is not the latest version of this item. The latest version can be found at:https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/134886.2
The Storage Versus Repair-Bandwidth Trade-off for Clustered Storage Systems
| dc.contributor.author | Prakash, N | |
| dc.contributor.author | Abdrashitov, Vitaly | |
| dc.contributor.author | Medard, Muriel | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-10-27T20:09:40Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-10-27T20:09:40Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/134886 | |
| dc.description.abstract | © 1963-2012 IEEE. We study a generalization of the setting of regenerating codes, motivated by applications to storage systems consisting of clusters of storage nodes. There are $n$ clusters in total, with $m$ nodes per cluster. A data file is coded and stored across the $mn$ nodes, with each node storing α symbols. For availability of data, we require that the file be retrievable by downloading the entire content from any subset of $k$ clusters. Nodes represent entities that can fail. We distinguish between intra-cluster and inter-cluster bandwidth (BW) costs during node repair. Node-repair in a cluster is accomplished by downloading β symbols each from any set of $d$ other clusters, dubbed remote helper clusters, and also up to α symbols each from any set of $\ell $ surviving nodes, dubbed local helper nodes, in the host cluster. We first identify the optimal trade-off between storage-overhead and inter-cluster repair-bandwidth under functional repair, and also present optimal exact-repair code constructions for a class of parameters. The new trade-off is strictly better than what is achievable via space-sharing existing coding solutions, whenever ℓ > 0$. We then obtain sharp lower bounds on the necessary intra-cluster repair BW to achieve optimal trade-off. Under functional repair, random linear network codes (RLNCs) simultaneously optimize usage of both inter- and intra-cluster repair BW; simulation results based on RLNCs suggest optimality of the bounds on intra-cluster repair-bandwidth. Our bounds reveal the interesting fact that, while it is beneficial to increase the number of local helper nodes ℓ $ in order to improve the storage-vs-inter-cluster-repair-BW trade-off, increasing ℓ $ not only increases intra-cluster BW in the host-cluster, but also increases the intra-cluster BW in the remote helper clusters. We also analyze resilience of the clustered storage system against passive eavesdropping by providing file-size bounds and optimal code constructions. | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) | |
| dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1109/TIT.2018.2806342 | |
| dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike | |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | |
| dc.source | arXiv | |
| dc.title | The Storage Versus Repair-Bandwidth Trade-off for Clustered Storage Systems | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dc.relation.journal | IEEE Transactions on Information Theory | |
| dc.eprint.version | Author's final manuscript | |
| dc.type.uri | http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle | |
| eprint.status | http://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerReviewed | |
| dc.date.updated | 2019-06-21T12:57:50Z | |
| dspace.orderedauthors | Prakash, N; Abdrashitov, V; Medard, M | |
| dspace.date.submission | 2019-06-21T12:57:52Z | |
| mit.journal.volume | 64 | |
| mit.journal.issue | 8 | |
| mit.metadata.status | Authority Work and Publication Information Needed |
