Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMaurice, Pauline
dc.contributor.authorHogan, Neville
dc.contributor.authorSternad, Dagmar
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-27T17:31:36Z
dc.date.available2021-10-27T20:10:20Z
dc.date.available2022-09-27T17:31:36Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1522-1598
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/135016.2
dc.description.abstract© 2018 American Physiological Society. All rights reserved. Manipulation of complex objects as in tool use is ubiquitous and has given humans an evolutionary advantage. This study examined the strategies humans choose when manipulating an object with underactuated internal dynamics, such as a cup of coffee. The dynamics of the object renders the temporal evolution complex, possibly even chaotic, and difficult to predict. A cart-and-pendulum model, loosely mimicking coffee sloshing in a cup, was implemented in a virtual environment with a haptic interface. Participants rhythmically manipulated the virtual cup containing a rolling ball; they could choose the oscillation frequency, whereas the amplitude was prescribed. Three hypotheses were tested: 1) humans decrease interaction forces between hand and object; 2) humans increase the predictability of the object dynamics; and 3) humans exploit the resonances of the coupled object-hand system. Analysis revealed that humans chose either a high-frequency strategy with antiphase cup-and-ball movements or a low-frequency strategy with in-phase cup-and-ball movements. Counter to hypothesis 1, they did not decrease interaction force; instead, they increased the predictability of the interaction dynamics, quantified by mutual information, supporting hypothesis 2. To address hypothesis 3, frequency analysis of the coupled hand-object system revealed two resonance frequencies separated by an antiresonance frequency. The low-frequency strategy exploited one resonance, whereas the high-frequency strategy afforded more choice, consistent with the frequency response of the coupled system; both strategies avoided the antiresonance. Hence, humans did not prioritize small interaction forces but rather strategies that rendered interactions predictable. These findings highlight that physical interactions with complex objects pose control challenges not present in unconstrained movements. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Daily actions involve manipulation of complex nonrigid objects, which present a challenge since humans have no direct control of the whole object. We used a virtual-reality experiment and simulations of a cart-and-pendulum system coupled to hand movements with impedance to analyze the manipulation of this underactuated object. We showed that participants developed strategies that increased the predictability of the object behavior by exploiting the resonance structure of the object but did not minimize the hand-object interaction force.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNIH Grant (R01-HD-087089)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNSF Grant (NSF-NRI 1637814)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNSF Grant (NSF-EAGER-1548501)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNIH Grant (R01-HD-081346)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNIH Grant (R21-DC-013095)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNSF Grant (NSF-NRI 1637854)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNSF Grant (NSF-EAGER-1548514)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEU Horizon 2020 Research & Innovation Program (Grant Agreement no. 731540)en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAmerican Physiological Societyen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1152/JN.00918.2017en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceOther repositoryen_US
dc.titlePredictability, force and (anti-)resonance in complex object controlen_US
dc.title.alternativePredictability, force, and (anti)resonance in complex object controlen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Neurophysiologyen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2020-07-21T15:40:59Z
dspace.orderedauthorsMaurice, P; Hogan, N; Sternad, Den_US
dspace.date.submission2020-07-21T15:41:05Z
mit.journal.volume120en_US
mit.journal.issue2en_US
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICY
mit.metadata.statusPublication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

VersionItemDateSummary

*Selected version