Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFrank, Morgan R
dc.contributor.authorAutor, David
dc.contributor.authorBessen, James E
dc.contributor.authorBrynjolfsson, Erik
dc.contributor.authorCebrian, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorDeming, David J
dc.contributor.authorFeldman, Maryann
dc.contributor.authorGroh, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorLobo, José
dc.contributor.authorMoro, Esteban
dc.contributor.authorWang, Dashun
dc.contributor.authorYoun, Hyejin
dc.contributor.authorRahwan, Iyad
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-27T20:10:43Z
dc.date.available2021-10-27T20:10:43Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/135096
dc.description.abstract© 2019 National Academy of Sciences. All Rights Reserved. Rapid advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and automation technologies have the potential to significantly disrupt labor markets. While AI and automation can augment the productivity of some workers, they can replace the work done by others and will likely transform almost all occupations at least to some degree. Rising automation is happening in a period of growing economic inequality, raising fears of mass technological unemployment and a renewed call for policy efforts to address the consequences of technological change. In this paper we discuss the barriers that inhibit scientists from measuring the effects of AI and automation on the future of work. These barriers include the lack of high-quality data about the nature of work (e.g., the dynamic requirements of occupations), lack of empirically informed models of key microlevel processes (e.g., skill substitution and human–machine complementarity), and insufficient understanding of how cognitive technologies interact with broader economic dynamics and institutional mechanisms (e.g., urban migration and international trade policy). Overcoming these barriers requires improvements in the longitudinal and spatial resolution of data, as well as refinements to data on workplace skills. These improvements will enable multidisciplinary research to quantitatively monitor and predict the complex evolution of work in tandem with technological progress. Finally, given the fundamental uncertainty in predicting technological change, we recommend developing a decision framework that focuses on resilience to unexpected scenarios in addition to general equilibrium behavior.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
dc.relation.isversionof10.1073/pnas.1900949116
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourcePNAS
dc.titleToward understanding the impact of artificial intelligence on labor
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Media Laboratory
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics
dc.contributor.departmentSloan School of Management
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Data, Systems, and Society
dc.relation.journalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerReviewed
dc.date.updated2019-07-25T15:59:11Z
dspace.orderedauthorsFrank, MR; Autor, D; Bessen, JE; Brynjolfsson, E; Cebrian, M; Deming, DJ; Feldman, M; Groh, M; Lobo, J; Moro, E; Wang, D; Youn, H; Rahwan, I
dspace.date.submission2019-07-25T15:59:12Z
mit.journal.volume116
mit.journal.issue14
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Needed


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record