Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStagnaro, MN
dc.contributor.authorRoss, RM
dc.contributor.authorPennycook, G
dc.contributor.authorRand, DG
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-27T20:23:45Z
dc.date.available2021-10-27T20:23:45Z
dc.date.issued2019-03-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/135506
dc.description.abstract© 2019, Society for Judgment and Decision making. All rights reserved. A substantial body of evidence suggests that favoring reason over intuition (employing an analytic cognitive style) is associated with reduced belief in God. In the current work, we address outstanding issues in this literature with two studies examining the relationship between analytic cognitive style (as measured by performance on the Cognitive Reflection Test) and belief in God. First, prior research focused on Judeo-Christian cultures, and it is uncertain whether the results generalize to other religious systems or beliefs. Study 1 helps to address this question by documenting a negative correlation between CRT performance and belief in God, r = −.18, in a sample of 513 participants from India, a majority Hindu country. Second, among 150 participants from the United Kingdom, Gervais et al. (2018) reported the first and (to date) only evidence for a positive relationship between CRT and belief in God. In Study 2, we assess the robustness of this result by recruiting 547 participants from the United Kingdom. Unlike Gervais et al., using the same items, we find a negative correlation between CRT and belief in God (r = −.19). Our results add further support to the argument that analytic thinking undermines belief in God.
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 3.0 unported license
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
dc.sourceJudgment and Decision Making
dc.titleCross-cultural support for a link between analytic thinking and disbelief in god: Evidence from India and the United Kingdom
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentSloan School of Management
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
dc.relation.journalJudgment and Decision Making
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerReviewed
dc.date.updated2021-04-12T18:22:30Z
dspace.orderedauthorsStagnaro, MN; Ross, RM; Pennycook, G; Rand, DG
dspace.date.submission2021-04-12T18:22:31Z
mit.journal.volume14
mit.journal.issue2
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Needed


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record