| dc.contributor.author | Byrne, Alex | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-10T20:25:40Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-10-27T20:24:10Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-01-10T20:25:40Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020-01-01 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/135596.2 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This comment mainly examines Yli-Vakkuri and Hawthorne’s preferred framework for examining whether narrow content is viable, arguing that their framework is not well-suited to the task; once a more traditional framework is adopted, Y&H’s case against internalism is strengthened. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC | en_US |
| dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1007/s11098-020-01548-2 | en_US |
| dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike | en_US |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | en_US |
| dc.source | Other repository | en_US |
| dc.title | Comment on Yli-Vakkuri and Hawthorne, Narrow Content | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dc.contributor.department | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy | en_US |
| dc.relation.journal | Philosophical Studies | en_US |
| dc.eprint.version | Author's final manuscript | en_US |
| dc.type.uri | http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle | en_US |
| eprint.status | http://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerReviewed | en_US |
| dc.date.updated | 2021-03-08T19:25:38Z | |
| dspace.orderedauthors | Byrne, A | en_US |
| dspace.date.submission | 2021-03-08T19:26:10Z | |
| mit.journal.volume | 178 | en_US |
| mit.journal.issue | 9 | en_US |
| mit.license | OPEN_ACCESS_POLICY | |
| mit.metadata.status | Publication Information Needed | en_US |
