Notice

This is not the latest version of this item. The latest version can be found at:https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/135802.2

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLundqvist, Mikael
dc.contributor.authorHerman, Pawel
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Earl K
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-27T20:29:22Z
dc.date.available2021-10-27T20:29:22Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/135802
dc.description.abstract© 2018 the authors. Persistent spiking has been thought to underlie working memory (WM). However, virtually all of the evidence for this comes from studies that averaged spiking across time and across trials, which masks the details. On single trials, activity often occurs in sparse transient bursts. This has important computational and functional advantages. In addition, examination of more complex tasks reveals neural coding in WM is dynamic over the course of a trial. All this suggests that spiking is important for WM, but that its role is more complex than simply persistent spiking.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Neuroscience
dc.relation.isversionof10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2485-17.2018
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceSociety for Neurocience
dc.titleWorking Memory: Delay Activity, Yes! Persistent Activity? Maybe Not
dc.typeArticle
dc.relation.journalJournal of Neuroscience
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerReviewed
dc.date.updated2019-10-03T14:17:09Z
dspace.orderedauthorsLundqvist, M; Herman, P; Miller, EK
dspace.date.submission2019-10-03T14:17:09Z
mit.journal.volume38
mit.journal.issue32
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Needed


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

VersionItemDateSummary

*Selected version